Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya all,

Congrats to all the winners.

Thanks to Adam and UAS for the great day.

I was there early so left early but it was great to put a forum name to a face.

Was also happy for my first dyno readout of 175KW, all stock bar cat back exh, pod, FMIC. Hit between 8 to 9 PSI. :no:

cheers all

Seems to me that the air-temp sensore may have been on the way out earlier in the day. Not taking anything away from anyone in particular but does anyone think that a stock 25 can make 175kW on 9psi and stock ECU? Or that a stock RB20 can make 185kW on 10psi with a stock ECU?

Confusing but don't know that it would've affected results or not...

Adrian

The results were all over the place.

I made 274rwkW on the same dyno with Ben's tuning, just a couple of months ago on 16psi.

Couldn't get more than 262rwkW yesterday and I upped the boost to 17psi.

Also checked the graphs, air temp sensor was fine when I ran in the morning, 24 degrees on the 274rwkW run, 27 on the 262rwkW run.

Was running on 10,000km old plugs, but still. 12rwkW's?!?!

Maybe I got slight wheelspin or something in the midrange cause the car wasn't strapped down like it was when it was being tuned?

meh. It's all good.

Great day all in all. Hurray for Abobob and Ben.

Seems to me that the air-temp sensore may have been on the way out earlier in the day. Not taking anything away from anyone in particular but does anyone think that a stock 25 can make 175kW on 9psi and stock ECU? Or that a stock RB20 can make 185kW on 10psi with a stock ECU?

Confusing but don't know that it would've affected results or not...

Adrian

yeah... dodge!!! but i definitely got 564rwkws!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Seems to me that the air-temp sensore may have been on the way out earlier in the day. Not taking anything away from anyone in particular but does anyone think that a stock 25 can make 175kW on 9psi and stock ECU? Or that a stock RB20 can make 185kW on 10psi with a stock ECU?

Confusing but don't know that it would've affected results or not...

Adrian

Hey, i made 177.1 with stock ecu an 10psi just before you went on

Hey, i made 177.1 with stock ecu an 10psi just before you went on

Not having a shot at your car, effort or the manner in which the day was run - just suggesting that there were some curious figures. :D

Adrian

Yeah well done to the organisers!

I had an awesome day as after my run, one of the guys said I should be getting more than 185kw, considering I've got an aftermarket turbo. And after 6 months of owning my car, I've finally realised that I have an Apexi AX53B70 P25 (380HP) Turbo in my car! I thought it was stock all this time, and never looked hard enough to really check (its completely hidden from view).

Even the last owner told me it was a stock turbo!! lol :D

Time to crank the boost!

Edited by Primordial
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...