Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had my r32 gtst tuned by Sam aka Dr Drift yesterday and i cannot reccomend him enough. He really gets nothing less than the best from your car. I think we were on the dyno for close to 3 hours and he charged me for a bit less, so i was really happy. Not like other places that want to sting you for the last 5 cents they can.

Anwyays im sure most of you know his work is 10/10, here are the results.

This was achieved on stock injectors so it shoudl also silence a few critics.

When you look at the dyno graph you can see what i went in with and what i left with. What you cant see is the afr's that were all over the place with the chip i drove in with and how perfect they are with the chip i left with.

Made my day :)

post-4425-1138067969.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

looks good. Sam knows what he's doing :)

did you get that done up in brisbane?

what turbo have you got? Rb20 i presume?

Cheers.

Sorry, relevant mods to the RB20 are hks 2530, nismo adj reg, bosch 044 intank. Top quality intake and exaust systems help too. I think the stockers limit is around 160-170 but i could be wrong.

Anyone who gets the chance i highly recommend, i would truly be disappointed if i couldnt have him tune it again in the future. Possibly for some tomei poncams (stuff adj cam gears) and nismo 550 or 600cc injectors.

I also have fuel economy now !!!!

EDIT: yes this was done in brisbane, gold coast actually and was @ 17 psi

Edited by 26GTS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1893689
Share on other sites

Sorry, relevant mods to the RB20 are hks 2530, nismo adj reg, bosch 044 intank. Top quality intake and exaust systems help too. I think the stockers limit is around 160-170 but i could be wrong.

Anyone who gets the chance i highly recommend, i would truly be disappointed if i couldnt have him tune it again in the future. Possibly for some tomei poncams (stuff adj cam gears) and nismo 550 or 600cc injectors.

I also have fuel economy now !!!!

thats good power for a 2530!

and yeah, getting good fuel economy was one of the highlights :)

do you have a z32 afm too?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1893705
Share on other sites

what are the air/fuel ratios like now, around 12:1? put up the graph if you can.

Yeah the air fuel ratios where as sweet as could be, around 12:1

I dont have any graphs with afrs on them, i was watching them on the screen though as he did run after run, tweak after tweak :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1893865
Share on other sites

How is your fuel economy now

how many litres per 100 km?

cheers

I dont drive it sedately enough to tell you sorry, plus i only got it done yesterday. If i could manage to drive it without flogging it then that might help. Its also my toy car so i only drive it a 5 or so times a week.

All i can say is its much better between 25 and 50% better at a reasonable guess.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1893999
Share on other sites

I dont drive it sedately enough to tell you sorry, plus i only got it done yesterday. If i could manage to drive it without flogging it then that might help. Its also my toy car so i only drive it a 5 or so times a week.

All i can say is its much better between 25 and 50% better at a reasonable guess.

Do you know if he emulates or does he burn chips ervery time he makes a change?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1894395
Share on other sites

This was achieved on stock injectors so it shoudl also silence a few critics.

Not really (not that im a critic)

But you've obviously bumped the rail pressure

nismo adj reg

So its kinda hard to tell :P

If you hadnt bump'd the pressure then i'd pay a silence of the galleries :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1894570
Share on other sites

Oh... and Sam was getting Emulation last tiem i spoke to him (couple months)

So i'd say one burn @ the end and she's away

He emulates them for sure, very tidy equipment he has been developing for years now.

And yeah Nismoid the pressure is bumped up, it was really only significant because sam had never tuned that from stock injectors.I plan to get the injectors and cams before he is back next. That should enable me to find the limit of the 2350.

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1895667
Share on other sites

i've got a similar setup (2530/RB20) and i'm not making as much power but mine seems to come on boost full boost (18psi) about 400-500rpm earlier from what i can see on your graph.

Damn, that sucks, i really dont find it laggy at all though very compareable to the stocker. I have a Profec b spec 2 that opens the holds the wastegate shut untill it reaches .75 bar.

I dont think you can tell how laggy something really is on the dyno

My 2 cents :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1896846
Share on other sites

You'll find that most operators don't really start loading up the car below 3k so it doesn't give your turbo the opportunity to start building boost as it would on the street. On the dyno i hit 20psi by 4k, on the street it's more like 3200.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1897218
Share on other sites

but think about what u just said, it that really giving u a good tune??

your gonna be tuning it for lower load points on the dyno then it hits the road and its using higher load point which wasnt tuned as well.

u got a dyno to simulate the road conditions and u dont use it to the full potential, i think thats abit silly.

thats my 2 cents, no disrespect to anyone.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1897401
Share on other sites

Glad to hear your happy with the tune, I was :)

yogi - Most of the low to midrange has been re-done, some runs were loaded up down low, Mick's car has excellent transition from the 14.7 AFM when running on the factory O2 down to 12.0 as the car's generating boost.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103040-dyno-results/#findComment-1900202
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...