Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

i did have a bit of trouble adjusting at mallala - i noticed where i used to be able to stay in 3rd on the front straight - i'd have to shift to 4th with the 25 box. BUT now i just decided to start my entries earlier and clutch it in 3rd lol...

BTW - the reverse lights do work - i re-clipped mine in and they both work good as new.

r33 are 3.79 though, i might pull my diff out and suss what it is before i worry to much about ratio's :spank:, there are ups and downs of going either way atm so im a lil up in the air which i should buy (r32 box or r33)

edit: im pretty sure the diff in my car is only a s13 type so at a guess the ratio would be 4.08:1?. and i thought 4.3 were auto gearsets? :ninja:

Edited by toffy

nah all R32's were 4.38 auto and manual

ca turbo s13 were also 4.38

with a 20 with a 25 box I'd say you'd need the short ratio still

with a 25 motor and box or a stroked 20 the sr s13 ratio might be better

all depends on the track you go to most though to

cheers for that info, mainly i go to baskerville which is mainly a 3rd gear track first turn is right at the top of third (140ish?+?) you hit the apex at around 115-120 and bounce the limi and scando for the next turn which is about 95-100 at the apex which is a down hill section s bend thingy coming out of that is a short straight which leads into another left hander that opens up on the exit to an up hill straight to munji as fast as you can :laugh: , im worried that if i have a shorter 3rd i wont have the speed for a big enough entry in turn 1 which is vital in comps and the exit corner and straight you need just as much speed really :laugh: :laugh:

  • 2 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...
would be good if I had a part number for a 33 speedo cog though

O rly?

32743-30P20- (Just the cog on the end)

Now it'd be good if I had some money...

post-11389-1180679868_thumb.jpg

32744-35F00 - generic nissan

post-11389-1180680317_thumb.jpg

post-11389-1180680326_thumb.jpg

post-11389-1180680336_thumb.jpg

Edited by TonyL
i have a 33 box with the speedo drive... i need to get the navara drive lol... also gotta replate that plastic drive behind my dash.. cause its rooted

i've still got the name of that place in wingfield that can apparently make metal ends for the cable - haven't been there yet though because... well silvias are electric so i dont give a f**k :lol:

whats the chassis code for navara?

Note: i haven't read any of this thread :cool:

Edited by TonyL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...