Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am thinking about going to a turbo upgrade.

At the moment this is what is done to the car:

- POD

- Brass button clutch

- 3" from the turbo

- Short Shift kit

- FMIC

This is what i plan to do after the turbo upgrade:

- Injectors

- Cams

- Fuel Pump

- Power FC

- Suspension

What turbo would you suggest and what price is it ruffly.

I have been told with the stock turbo and some modz i cant get anymore than 220RWKW.

I want between 250RWKW and 350RWKW, so please advise the right turbo and modz for my needs.

-SINDOWS

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103351-r33-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

When i planed my turbo upgrade, i wanted it to look as std as possible so i bought a 2nd hand hi-flowed R33 turbo and fitted the VG30 exhaust housing (a R34 hiflow is equivalent and doesn't need the VG30 housing)

My mod list includes variations of all your above mentioned items but i also had my head "race ported". Even though this has given me more flow, i now realise that it also has made the combo a little laggier, but i have no regrets ;).

End result: 270rwkw@15psi

Standard bottom end; so we stopped tunning at 15psi, then lowered it to 13-14psi to make a reliable 250rwkw and fine tuned the setup at this level.

theres a massive difference between 250rwk and 350rwkw so you should think carefully before deciding, the cost difference is around 10k.

250rwkw it would go for hks gt-rs or garret equiv, z32 afm, 550cc inj, powerfc, heavy duty clutch, tyres, suspension work, cold air intake, intercooler, boost controller, 3.5" split dump zorst and cat back

for 350rwkw it beyond the safe internal limit for rb25

so youll need to open it up to safely make that power.

ie: cams, pistons, injectors

you need a larger turbo (more and more lag)

with forged pistons, cams most likely

bigger clutch, better suspension work

and so on

as the power graph increases linerally the cost graph increases exponentially.

Im new to this and was just wondering what mods id need to fit a Garret T28 to my R33 GTS25t (RB25DET) without ending up damaging the engine ie-FMIC,Boost controller etc planning on having all these but wondering wether its safe to do them one at a time or wait and have it all done at the same time, my stock turbos on the way out so was thinking of fitting the turbo first and the rest later is this wise/safe any feedback would be apreciated

T28 isnt bolt on.

Better to purchase one that it IMO. Ease of installation saves costs.

Please search for more info on upgrades and what you need

OR read these threads below, all the info you need is in the second link for supporting mods.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=55845

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=66556

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...