Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

currently been thinking about upgrading my HKS GT-RS turbo on my R33 GTST. im after the 320 rwkw make but dont want a laggy ass turbo. Currently making 260rwkw and bored of it.

What turbo's have you people seen make 320rwkw without too much lag (preferably HKS turbos). considering the HKS 3040 but not too sure on how it goes.

any help/dyno graphs will be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/
Share on other sites

320rwkw shouldn't be difficult to achieve with the HKS3040R or Garrett equivalent provided you do have a built engine. I think there are a few people on here who can personally vouch for that...

I've got a GT3040R on my R33 making around 280rwkw on 17psi (see dyno graph below). I've only got a std bottom end, so I haven't really pushed the limits of the turbo too much at this stage, but there's definately potential to make a lot more power.

Obviously it's not going to be as responsive as your current set up, but full boost by just over 4000rpm isn't too bad when you making approx 300rwkw.

Hope that helps :rolleyes:

post-10992-1139663951.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1942129
Share on other sites

The Garrett GT3040R is rated is 600hp.

SEE HERE

I also forgot to mention that i have the 0.82a/r turbine housing, so I guess you could go for the 0.63a/r if you wanted less lag, although power would come on like a light switch which would make traction a bit of a problem. The 0.82 is nice and progressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1943555
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

What about the GT2835 Pro S with the 0.87 rear housing? That should get you there.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944036
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

I used to think that 300+ would be pushing it with the 0.63, but after seeing Wilchs results in the rb25 dyno thread - i.e mid 270's @ 16-17psi with a .63 GT30R on rb25 w/std internals (I think?) - I guess 300 could be possible with a little more boost and a rebuilt engine.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

I think it was a HKS3040R from what I remember when I was researching a while ago (may be wrong)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944288
Share on other sites

1.0 Japanese PS = 0.98632 BHP

actually PS is not a japanese measurement. i dunno where you got that from but it's the (old) german standard of horsepower. it stands for Pferdestärke which i am quite positive is not japanese. basically means horse power in german.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945350
Share on other sites

That had a lot of stuff done to it to get that.

An R33 RB25 head isn't the most amazing piece of gear and it's still only 2.5 litres.  Imagine how peaky 300-350rwkw would be.  Sounds ilke a waste of time if you ask me.

I'd agree. Much over 300rwkw and its gonna be peaky.

My setup (in my opinion) with the 600hp GT30 was as late as i would want a turbo to come on (4200/4500rpm/17psi)

With a redline of high 7000's thats not the "greatest"

Hence why im RB26, aiming for 330rwkw but rather than 4500rpm, it'll be more like 3500rpm, with a MUCH broader span of power, with 240rwkw in before 3000rpm (where rb25 was more like 150rwkw) based on results of other cars with a setup similar to me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945579
Share on other sites

Turbo's aside...

Have you considered using an RB30 bottom end?

If I ever had to rebuild my engine, I'd seriously contemplate going that way as the RB30 bottom end should definately give a much broader power band than the RB25. Add in a GT30 or GT35 turbo (with the usual supporting mods) and 320rwkw should be a formality. The bonus being that the power is usuable over a large part of the rev range as opposed to having peak power at the top of the rev range and not much else for the rest of it if you had the same power with the RB25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1946895
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Something to note, on an aftermarket BOV, it's quite possible to end up with the worst of both worlds, where on light throttle, there isn't enough force to open the BOV so you get small reversion and driveability issues, and with the venting to atmosphere, it dumps a lot of fuel on shifts. Realistically, dumping to atmosphere under power isn't a major driveability issues, compared to the issues of stalling from reversion. If you're getting up the throttle, then putting the clutch in, say on a shift up, but then don't release the clutch, yes, the engine can and will stall, but, just drive around it, and that's easy, let the clutch out in the next gear and the car rolling will keep it all running / going.who wants a hard hit of throttle and then to just let the motor idle anyway?   Main issue for driveability is blipping throttle and it wanting to stall, like when parking or trying to move in slow traffic.
    • As in they quoted one price, you mentioned the exhaust, and they promptly added $200 on top? Interesting.
    • Note that I'm not suggesting this is a great idea. Just saying that it is something that could be done to achieve a better outcome than the more shit ideas will provide.
    • I'd try removing it, connecting hoses and see if that helps. Depending on specs, it could actually be restricting the flow(it also might be helping).
    • Yes, that's a hybrid BOV. The adjustable spring load ones are about making teh pressure build up higher before venting, so you get a more agressive whoosh. That is not what I meant or what you want. By "restricting", I don't mean "keep it closed until the pressure is higher, then open it fully". I mean "open it as soon as it is required, but only have a small port area, so that the flow rate out of it is slowed down". The pressure will rise to be higher than a bigger ported BOV would provide, but it would do while it is venting. The idea is to slow down the rate at which the replacement eair is flowing past the AFM, to reduce the magnitude of the air flow signal peak, to reduce the amount of fuel that is added per revolution.
×
×
  • Create New...