Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Assuming you have an auto, it would change the shift points. Power would raise the RPM at which it changes up (and down probably), and the snow setting usually means your car will take off in second to avoid wheelspin.

ah cool thanks for the reply guys,

so the button is a bit like the econ buttons on the ford falcons, where you can turn it on to stop it from holding onto the gear for too long, hence increases fuel economy,

while the power button is the reverse, it will allow you to get more power out of the engine,

currently i noticed if you plant your foot down, the engine still revs to 7k, what will be different if power is switched on?

In power it kicks down a lot easier, and is more reluctant to change up. Also seems to launch better, dont know if im imagining it but.

Driving in power mode is much more fun when you want to fang, the car feels sluggish in normal and snow modes. Snow is good for saving fuel but!

The enging will rev the same in any mode.

snow mode takes of in 2nd gear ....auto stays standard gearing and power holds peak rpm longer so it picks up speed quicker .

btw my power button lights up orange , is the snow meant to light up blue or is my bulb in it dead ????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...