Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im lookin at gettin my car down into the 11s, and maybe 10s (in-time)

besides all the other stuff that obviously needs to be done, what do u guys think is the best size cooler and turbo to get?

at the moment im leaning towards a t4 cos i want to run mega boost in my car..over 20/25 psi, but i want it to kick in early, like still at 3k rpm, not 6k

any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/
Share on other sites

What sort of hp figure are you chasing?

IMHO, you are better off running the lowest boost that you can. Dont confuse boost pressure with air flow. It is possible to get a turbo to pump more air at 1bar than another turbo pushing 2 bar, the lower the boost the less likely you will experience detonation. Also with higher boost pressure, you may have to decompress the engine = worse off boost response and less torque at lower revs, something I would like to avoid.

It appears to me that sometimes people use boost pressure to overcome a poorly flowing engine. If you get your head ported, manifold and plenum match ported (with a decent plenum), and a decent set of cams and cam gears, you will be able to get alot better power at lower boost - with the right turbo.

As an example, AED can flow an RB25 head to 403hp at atmo, and Darren is quite confident that 600hp would be easily achievable at 1 bar.

Just some food for thought, decide what your hp goals are, and see what the best setup would be to achieve this with lowest possible boost - within of course, your other requirements of where you would like boost to come on.

Remember aslo, that in an ideal world, we would be able to make 600bhp with boost hitting hard at 1500rpm, but this just will not happen - the bigger the hp you want, the more lag to expect within reason.

Just my 0.02

Steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/#findComment-169871
Share on other sites

Yup as Steve said, choose a HP figure and build around that.

I see way too many people buying the biggest turbo and biggest fmic they can find and it just doesn't work together and they either end up with serious lag or way under the power figures they were expecting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/#findComment-169981
Share on other sites

You need between 350 and 400HP at the flywheel to get the 11's all things being equal. More horsepower makes that task easier all the same, so why not 800HP?

Readings at the tyres are not what you ought to interest yourself in. Get components together for an engine power rating.

A good ballbearing turbo, airflow rated at 420-450HP should do the trick, then a intercooler of the same rating. Then do everything else that needs doing for that power, to make the motor last.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/#findComment-170314
Share on other sites

hmmm..start saving!! to get you up to that is probably going to cost you the best part of $10k (depending on how you source your parts). Every second off is $$$ and it goes up and up.

Do you want to get those times for coolness factor or to actually use on a track in drag or racing??

You might actually find that as you go up you might have second thoughts about having something that quick (try that in the wet :D). Seems like you are chasing something truly quick but as you get into it more, because of reliability, safety and above all cost (petrol costs, rebuilding engines, running back and foward, etc, etc) you might have second thoughts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/#findComment-172140
Share on other sites

Here is an example : 400Hp or just a snick under in a car that weighs the same as an R33 line (VH commodore) low 11's all day on street rubber, 10's with slicks.

Skylines are not a special case. Apply the basics with that much power and you will get the times.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10570-fmicturbo/#findComment-172674
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...