Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:)

Hey, just a 'interest' thread... who here luves some good techo? All I listen too......

Here is a site 4 yas if you like live sets.... great value for money.

www.djsets.co.uk

Ive got around 200hrs now of live sets, from Carl Cox, ATB, Yves Deruyter, Blank & Jones, Gabriel & Dreisden, Infected Mushroom, and others.

btw: Im into trance; Yves Deruyter absolutely rocks; its cranking right here atm!

:lol:

Edited by bwilkeson
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/
Share on other sites

Im a fan of Nick Skitz, Warp Brothers & Carl Cox just to name a few.

Dont mind trance but, I prefer my Hi NRG. Always wanted to go to a rave in Holland & the Love Parade in Dectsch land with my fluro viking boots & glow stick in hand B) :lol:.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1961654
Share on other sites

Ordered this gear "Blank & Jones, Gabriel & Dreisden, Infected Mushroom, Yahel" last wednesday, from uk www.djsets.co.uk. Received today, thats within 3 business days from across the other side of the world.

Awesome value. I recommend this fella to you all, over 6000 compilations on file. Or buy the massive harddrive full of music http://www.djsets.co.uk/specialoffers/ !!! hahaha

edit: that link has 900GIG of hardrives full of awesome live dj sets.... Ive got 22gig (9 days straight of music) now. Imagine how many days the 900gig would go for!! HUUGEE - worked it out, thats 285 days straight of techno.

Edited by bwilkeson
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1966664
Share on other sites

techno trance(of all kinds), drum and bass, nrg, hardcore....its all wickid!!!! cant beat an awsome trace set tho. i saw some wikid sets last year when i went to sydney at home bar!!!!

yeah agree

i used to listen to heaps but not much now

got a bit of old school stuff sum vynle stuff and sum rotterdam hardcore

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1966939
Share on other sites

i cringed when i saw the title of this thread ..... i bet most of you would hate techno the actual style but love sampled progressive dance music ....

Prog house Vs tribal is what i spin ...

if i hear another synth created techno album or track i may commit sushi... the whole tracks were just about created on a cheesy synth loops that roll through octave scales of blipps and bleeps...

Check out some Sander k then try listening to mid nintys techno from the synth era and you will get what i mean

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1967751
Share on other sites

i cringed when i saw the title of this thread ..... i bet most of you would hate techno the actual style but love sampled progressive dance music ....

What Im mean by the title: Techno; in my eyes means Technological-based music, ie music made via new means of technology other than the older time-aged styles (such as strings, keys, animal skins, wood instruments, etc)

So techno encompases all music that is technologically made (doesnt it?). Under techno you have your sub-cultures, such as hardcore, house, trance, jungle, drum n bass, dance, etc etc.

Me.... well I used to be into Hardcore, but really appreciate good uplifitng trance these days; takes me to my all important happy-zone. And with my knees killing me (yet again, 7 surgeries & they are as bad as ever) I dont get to see my happy-zone very often. Last night had ATB pumping from some live sets (from that link in the first post) - awesome stuff.

Happy happy joy joy to you all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1970661
Share on other sites

What Im mean by the title: Techno; in my eyes means Technological-based music, ie music made via new means of technology other than the older time-aged styles (such as strings, keys, animal skins, wood instruments, etc)

So techno encompases all music that is technologically made (doesnt it?). Under techno you have your sub-cultures, such as hardcore, house, trance, jungle, drum n bass, dance, etc etc.

Me.... well I used to be into Hardcore, but really appreciate good uplifitng trance these days; takes me to my all important happy-zone. And with my knees killing me (yet again, 7 surgeries & they are as bad as ever) I dont get to see my happy-zone very often. Last night had ATB pumping from some live sets (from that link in the first post) - awesome stuff.

Happy happy joy joy to you all.

yeah cool!

the way you see it is logicaly correct i spose but in a Dj's world techno is now a style usually related to the earlier production sounds and methods used to make it as i mentioned, its still around but usualy mixed in now.... dont go up to a tribal dj and say yeah man its all techno really ...he will probably drop ya because he has not one bleep sample in his set !

the main way to title it is DANCE >.... everyone luvs progressive the just dont understand how the word relates to the styles they like. Dance is crazy at the moment because there using the old TECHNO tecniques with new digital anolog sounds and creating the craziest music around with more freedom !

either way its all sequencing .... we should change the title to technilogical sequencing music anyone :P

its good stuff hey ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1971915
Share on other sites

yeah cool!

...we should change the title to technilogical sequencing music anyone :P

its good stuff hey ?

Oh yeah!

Used to be into the Nirvana stuff but found I couldnt study to it for my yr 11/12 exams (early 90's), so I tried out CoastFm & found 'techno'. Found I could really study to it, with the *heart*beat etc.

God some of that old skool cranked! Mockmoon remix, The Fly, stuff like that, awesome.

But yeah, I hear you, & I agree. Btw, havent listened to guitars since! Go the Trance!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1971950
Share on other sites

to give you an idea... josh winks is considered one of the best Techno artist's around ..

i cant stand it .... but i do own some of the samples he uses as far as accapella.... and have sorrta lied to girls that i like it because they asume the sample is the track....shame on me! hehe... dload a track of his and see if you actualy like that stye mate ... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106299-techno-any1/#findComment-1972003
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...