Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cant believe ir just read 13 pages of all this

1.4 sixty foot and 129 mph and only a 10.8

you need to changes gears faster that thing will go 10.1 with ease.

or get an auto.

good work i like it.

our cars would be a good match up.

Yeah love to champ

Reason why i didnt flat change is the scared to blow the box and thats useless money

I have just finished putting the auto in and have driven the car but have noticed i have only got around 4-5 psi of boost

I am going to check this problem out and Do a comparence dyno printout from Manual To auto.

The box i am running is a 2 speed powerglide with transbrake.TCT Converter With a mech Diode

I have also got a Chrome moly 1 piece tailshaft made to help with the transfer

I will post tomorrow the difference and will be back at the track in 2 weeks

My next aim is to run in the 9 second area.If it cannot be done with the standard head which i think is possible with some Nitrous but if not i will use the Solid lifter head which i have got with a steel head gasket.And that also goes if the head gasket goes i will also change heads.

Edited by MR331307
I cant believe that rb25 is still going. I hope my rb30det can make 400rwhp in stock form and be reliable!!! if that rb25 can do then mine can get close to it im sure :cheers:

Hey Guilt-Toy, I have an internally stock (apart from poncams) rb25 making 410.7rwhp and it is running fine. It is on a conservative tune with timing advance and a/f ratios to keep it running as long as possible. But then again others running less have had the motor pop. I guess a lot has to do with the tuning and the condition of the internals to begin with.

Cheers,

JB

Ok have run the box in a bit on the dyno and have done 4 power runs

Without modifying the tune i have made 477 WRHP with the auto on just 18 psi Boost

Before the auto i was making on average 500 RWHP on 18 psi of boost on pump fuel

I will post the nitrous compared sheet next week when im back from Newcastle as well as this sheet

But as far as what i can see i only lost 23 RWHP

I also tried to spool it on the brake and found it couldnt get more then 3 psi

I tried with the nitrous and it flared straight away

This is due to the converter being a Transbrake Nos setup converter

The converter Was built by John @ TCT in melbourne which i think did a unreal job and the box was built by Joe @ Wollongong Automatics.

I should be back at the track in 2 weeks now

Waiting on the car to be teched.

My aim is to run in the 9 second area and further till something gives way.If something does i will change motors and try eventually to run into the lower 9 area.

Any questions just ask

Edited by MR331307
1200hp would be good for 8's or 7's wouldn't it? whens the beast arrive?

Im using this engine in my Full chassis car that my father and i am building

Im using the other engine i have in this one

the one with the solid head ETC

i do

but i am not allowed to Show the Setup

(FAMILLLLYYYY MATTERS)

when its closer to being @ the Track ill post some photos of it and the car

This is what is in the Motor im putting in this Car

-RB26 Crank

-N1 oil Pump

-EAGLE H beam Rods

-ACL forged Pistons

-ARP main & head Stud kits

-Cometic Head Gasket

-RB25 Head with TOMMIE Valve Springs,Solid Lifters,Tommie 272 @ 11.5 lift Cams

Aiming For 600 RWHP+++ and a low 9

Edited by MR331307

hey bro, look ive just spent the good part of 2 1/2 hours reading this thread and its my bloody birthday, ive even held of on the cake till i read this, lol. What a thread, one of the best of read on this site. To the doubters out there, well you said he was dreaming and the dream came alive. The power you got out of the engine was pheonaminal, it makes ya think what a 13 odd year old engine can actually achieve. To the believers, aim high and you can go far. I know that the availability of a dyno and the mind of someone like your self (mechanicaly) not everyone has, but you took advantage of it and done well. That engine had a lot of balls. Anyway good luck with the new one and who knows what power you'll hit with this one.

Damo

hey bro, look ive just spent the good part of 2 1/2 hours reading this thread and its my bloody birthday, ive even held of on the cake till i read this, lol. What a thread, one of the best of read on this site. To the doubters out there, well you said he was dreaming and the dream came alive. The power you got out of the engine was pheonaminal, it makes ya think what a 13 odd year old engine can actually achieve. To the believers, aim high and you can go far. I know that the availability of a dyno and the mind of someone like your self (mechanicaly) not everyone has, but you took advantage of it and done well. That engine had a lot of balls. Anyway good luck with the new one and who knows what power you'll hit with this one.

Damo

LOL HAPPY BIRTHDAY BRO

Anyways ill post some picts of the Internals

If i wasnt Selfish and didnt try to get more power out of it i would say it would of Lasted alot longer but i was always Trying to make more instead of leaving it

Anyways

Shouldnt be to long

Cheers mate, but also in saying that you were selfish, you also did something that im pretty sure a lot of people have always wanted to do but have never had the balls or money to do, run the bitch as hard as it could do and not care about the consiquences, i think a lot of poeple will actually understand that the more you look after the car, the more power can be put into it. In saying that, within reason ha ha.

Damo

After all the Motor Has been through i can say that it is possible to Make 470 RWHP safely on a Street RB25 Standard motor and make it last on Pump Fuel.

To make even more Safer power i recommend Changing the Head Gasket to a Tommie or Cometic and Upgrading Cams in which you wont have to Run as much Ignition Timing and Boost.As for the Bottom end i think that all of it can last.

The main Reasons for the Car making the power is

1) suffiecent intercooler (this is what Makes your Power And makes the Engine last Due to A stable Low Air Temp)

2) the Design Inside the Plenium

3)A Efficent Turbo (there is no need to Get a 1000 hp turbo if all your looking at is 600 engine HP)

4) Great Ignition Setup which is pretty basic and can get even better like the Next setup im doing which runs 6 coils

5) A good ECU

6)Reducing Load Off the Engine EG Clutch fan

7) good Fuel Supply

well done mate its lasted alot longer than the knockers on here had imagined. bout time someone showed em they are keyboard mechanics and dont actually know from there own experience, just from "i heard ..." and "i reckon ..." comments said on forums.

good luck with the new setup

well done mate its lasted alot longer than the knockers on here had imagined. bout time someone showed em they are keyboard mechanics and dont actually know from there own experience, just from "i heard ..." and "i reckon ..." comments said on forums.

good luck with the new setup

Thanks Mate

I havent commented yet and thats becoz I know f**kall about what destroys a good motor at that amount of power, but its interesting to note that it was No6 that lost compession, as that piston seems to be the one that cops it alot, higher temps and first to lean out, have you accounted for this in the new setup?

And Oh well done I would be happy to have your dyno hours :(

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...