Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why dont you put Windows 7 Enterprise on it with a 90 day free trial with internet activation that will give you more than enough time to do what you need to in a better environment than vista

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495

why dont you put Windows 7 Enterprise on it with a 90 day free trial with internet activation that will give you more than enough time to do what you need to in a better environment than vista

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495

QFT. Vista sucks.

-D

Would love too upgrade it but can't.

I've been trying to use my own laptop with Windows 7 on it for some of the work and it just doesn't communicate well enough with our other computers and sensors in the unit as they aren't programed for it.

My work is f**king retarted to even be using Vista as only XP and 2000 have been tested proporly with our equipment and proven to work.

Think I might have sorted it out though.

  • 4 weeks later...

My internet has been playing up tonight somewhat (but was working through the period below) .... not sure if my internet disconnections are an Adam Wimax issue or what ... but checking through my modem log I came across these:

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:04:04 PM Blocked access attempt from 212.34.104.8:1706 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:04:06 PM Blocked access attempt from 212.34.104.8:1706 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:05:54 PM Blocked access attempt from 84.237.162.93:4574 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:05:57 PM Blocked access attempt from 84.237.162.93:4574 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:08:46 PM Blocked access attempt from 222.189.238.115:6000 to TCP port 3306

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:10:32 PM Blocked access attempt from 94.67.201.65:1040 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:10:35 PM Blocked access attempt from 94.67.201.65:1040 to TCP port 445

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:16:37 PM Blocked access attempt from 90.156.201.106:80 to TCP port 2386

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:16:40 PM Blocked access attempt from 90.156.201.106:80 to TCP port 2386

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:18:24 PM Blocked access attempt from 208.248.77.132:80 to TCP port 48623

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:22:41 PM Blocked access attempt from 60.172.22.77:6000 to TCP port 1433

Thursday, 15 December 2011 9:24:34 PM Blocked access attempt from 187.59.151.131:4638 to TCP port 23

Is this normal, or is someone tring to hack me? And no, I had no Torrents or anything downloading at the time.

My internet has been playing up tonight somewhat (but was working through the period below) .... not sure if my internet disconnections are an Adam Wimax issue or what ... but checking through my modem log I came across these:

<snip>

Is this normal, or is someone tring to hack me? And no, I had no Torrents or anything downloading at the time.

Thats a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS) - your firewall is doing the right thing in blocking it.

Mind you your firewall is only catching a portion of them. Looking at the port numbers indicates they're fishing for weaknesses so the firewall is only going to notice any ports its setup to notice. Its not uncommon to be randomly probed by many hosts on all ports from 0-65536 or whatever the upper level is

-D

Thanks Ben, that's what I thought.

BUT, I have rebooted my modem around 6 times tonight, so (I presume - I haven't kept an eye on it) my Adam-assigned IP keeps changing - how would they know to keep attacking me when my IP changes? I had a look and those IPs are from all over the place, Taiwan, Costa rice, Russia .... I assume they got my IP from downloading Torrents, but like I said my IP with Adam is not static, and changes all the time .....

Thanks Ben, that's what I thought.

BUT, I have rebooted my modem around 6 times tonight, so (I presume - I haven't kept an eye on it) my Adam-assigned IP keeps changing - how would they know to keep attacking me when my IP changes? I had a look and those IPs are from all over the place, Taiwan, Costa rice, Russia .... I assume they got my IP from downloading Torrents, but like I said my IP with Adam is not static, and changes all the time .....

it could be based upon other things, such as mac addresses, or if you have a trojan that reports your ip the same way dyndns does. What you need to do is install a packet sniffer and capture all the traffic ur eth0 adapter puts out from the time its initialized and check to see what packets are being sent back to the above ips as well as filter it via your mac address/adresses (mac address of NIC on mobo is diff to mac addy on your TA aka the adsl modem/cable modem - all depends upon which layer its getting filtered)

First check is download spybot, adaware, their updates and avast. remove and reinstall your firewall/av, install spyware/adaware, run scans, clean, install avast, update, run scan and then start a packet sniffer to see exactly what incoming requests are coming in for whatever reason

-D

Every IP on the internet is constantly getting attacked and scanned - typically automated by bots/viruses/worms. They infect machines and then use those to scan even more hosts. On my home router, I record tens of thousands attempts a day - what you're seeing is pretty normal to me.

Port 445 is SMB over TCP - so basically people trying to access shares.

Port 1433 is MS SQL - worms looking to attack Microsoft SQL servers

Port 23 is telnet - people trying to login to your router

Not sure on 2386 or 48623 but google lists them as ports people scan for stuff, so probably some service that can be easily attacked. Another common port you'll see accessed is port 22 (SSH), people trying to login to UNIX routers and certain routers. When attackers/bots/worms find ports like telnet/SSH open, they'll then try and attempt common username/passwords to try and break in.

I'd probably ignore those logs as nothing to worry about either way.

Have you tried calling up Adam yet - they may have some clues and be able to provide plenty of trouble-shooting advice :)

I have disabled port TCP 445 just to be safe - this seems to be the most common port sniffed, and the interwebz says it is hackers number 1 target.

I run a registered/active version of Malwarebytes - it goes OFF like a frog in a sock if someone tries to access my computer, so it doesn't look like anthing is getting through. I once had someone try to backtrace me through UTorrent and Malwarebytes went BALLISTIC - so I know it works.

Interestingly I rebooted my connection 15 minutes ago and sure enough it issued me a different IP from Adam - and since then I haven't been sniffed .... whereas on my last reconnection I was hammered wihtin 3 minutes of connection. Weird. I assume this is an Adam-directed DDOS, and have given Adam Internet the heads-up just in case.

But yeah I will run all the scans. thanks for the tip!

I'm addicted to the classic GTA 3 at the moment. Released a few days ago for mobile on the Android Market & Apple App Store; great classic! Awesome for killing time on the ride to work on public transport. Runs very well on the Galaxy S II. Few bugs in the first release, but pretty bloody impressive running as fast and smooth as it does on a smartphone!

I'm addicted to the classic GTA 3 at the moment. Released a few days ago for mobile on the Android Market & Apple App Store; great classic! Awesome for killing time on the ride to work on public transport. Runs very well on the Galaxy S II. Few bugs in the first release, but pretty bloody impressive running as fast and smooth as it does on a smartphone!

Hmmm, I may have to get this for my Nexus, I love GTA 3.

I did notice a couple of reviews in the Market from Nexus users re GTA III - mass crashing apparently. Hope Rockstar sort it out!

Would be brilliant on the big Nexus display. I want one! :D

  • 2 weeks later...

thanks mate! was on this site earlier and the port forwarding button on the left hand side doesnt come up? reckon thats why im at a loss here :(

Sometimes it is called Virtual Server instead of Port forwarding

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...