Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so basically it is possible to use if you re wire it in and re-map the ECU to use it, similar to a Z32 on rb20..

where as a S1 AFM would be direct plug in replacement, but would still need a re-mapped ecu ??

No need to remap, they both have the same 0-5V output per same gm/air sec entering engine.

Re-wire to suit and its apples :down:

You only need to remap if you change to a Z32/Q45 AFM as these read less Volts per gm/air entering engine.

Edited by RB30-POWER

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

there shouldn't be any difference in them at all as they are both 80mm..??

but i swear i read somewhere that the rb20 items cant handle as much power as a rb25 item.

Craved, the r33 s1 and r32 afm's are most definitely the same.

From observations the R33 and R32 PowerFC airflow curves do vary slightly.

It appear the r33 airflow curve returns a higher load/airflow for a given afm voltage. SO possibly this is where you may see r33's making the same power as r32's on the same afm voltage.

I'm not completely sure what directly affects the airflow curve, maybe engine efficiency.. I have no idea.

The rb20/25 afm's have different airflow curves in the s13/s14 pfc's also.. Go figure.. :( I have no idea why.

so theoretically if the R33 afm shows the same voltage for a higher air flow through it, that would mean that if you swapped the AFM's the RB20 would run leaner without changing anything.

doesn't sound nice if i have read what you said correctly Joel.

No... :(

The airflow curves are located within the ecu. So the physical afm, there is ZERO difference.

All ECU's contain different airflow curves for a given afm.

So the same afm on different ecu's will return a slightly different load value. As previously said I am not sure why the airflow curves are different UNLESS it has some thing to do with engine efficiency. No idea. :(

I shouldn't have gone so in depth, only confuses. :(

I've had both afm's on the dyno on my R32 RB20DET many years ago. There was no difference. Exactly 100% the same afr ratios. :)

hmmm, so afr's are still the same, and all I need to do is rewire?

Now that I can do.

If/when I do it, I'll post up some pics.

(If engine blows up, I will come looking for cubes and kill him... :( )

:(

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

I wasn't under the impression the guy was looking to upgrade, more so just replace a faulty AFM with another he had lieing around.

hehe i hadn't spoken to wil about why he was doing it, i sort of hijacked it a little to see if there is an other reason to change them over for power gains.. while still getting his question answered

this is only since i was under the impression that the rb20 afm was only good for about 200rwkw, then rb25 was 250ish rwkw then 300+ for the z32 ..

there'd be no difference between the r32 one and the series1 afm, as they are the same unit.. the only difference is the s2 one as per above.

where they actually run out of resolution and effectively the power they can make may be different because of the different head flow between the rb20 and rb25 heads. Thats why people probably come to the conclusion they make different power, therefore they are different.. no the afm is the same, the engines are different :mad:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...