Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so basically it is possible to use if you re wire it in and re-map the ECU to use it, similar to a Z32 on rb20..

where as a S1 AFM would be direct plug in replacement, but would still need a re-mapped ecu ??

No need to remap, they both have the same 0-5V output per same gm/air sec entering engine.

Re-wire to suit and its apples :down:

You only need to remap if you change to a Z32/Q45 AFM as these read less Volts per gm/air entering engine.

Edited by RB30-POWER

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

there shouldn't be any difference in them at all as they are both 80mm..??

but i swear i read somewhere that the rb20 items cant handle as much power as a rb25 item.

Craved, the r33 s1 and r32 afm's are most definitely the same.

From observations the R33 and R32 PowerFC airflow curves do vary slightly.

It appear the r33 airflow curve returns a higher load/airflow for a given afm voltage. SO possibly this is where you may see r33's making the same power as r32's on the same afm voltage.

I'm not completely sure what directly affects the airflow curve, maybe engine efficiency.. I have no idea.

The rb20/25 afm's have different airflow curves in the s13/s14 pfc's also.. Go figure.. :( I have no idea why.

so theoretically if the R33 afm shows the same voltage for a higher air flow through it, that would mean that if you swapped the AFM's the RB20 would run leaner without changing anything.

doesn't sound nice if i have read what you said correctly Joel.

No... :(

The airflow curves are located within the ecu. So the physical afm, there is ZERO difference.

All ECU's contain different airflow curves for a given afm.

So the same afm on different ecu's will return a slightly different load value. As previously said I am not sure why the airflow curves are different UNLESS it has some thing to do with engine efficiency. No idea. :(

I shouldn't have gone so in depth, only confuses. :(

I've had both afm's on the dyno on my R32 RB20DET many years ago. There was no difference. Exactly 100% the same afr ratios. :)

hmmm, so afr's are still the same, and all I need to do is rewire?

Now that I can do.

If/when I do it, I'll post up some pics.

(If engine blows up, I will come looking for cubes and kill him... :( )

:(

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

I wasn't under the impression the guy was looking to upgrade, more so just replace a faulty AFM with another he had lieing around.

hehe i hadn't spoken to wil about why he was doing it, i sort of hijacked it a little to see if there is an other reason to change them over for power gains.. while still getting his question answered

this is only since i was under the impression that the rb20 afm was only good for about 200rwkw, then rb25 was 250ish rwkw then 300+ for the z32 ..

there'd be no difference between the r32 one and the series1 afm, as they are the same unit.. the only difference is the s2 one as per above.

where they actually run out of resolution and effectively the power they can make may be different because of the different head flow between the rb20 and rb25 heads. Thats why people probably come to the conclusion they make different power, therefore they are different.. no the afm is the same, the engines are different :mad:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...