Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got the car dynod. less power then i was hoping for. but then half that is due to the bad tune the car has as showen by the A/F ratio. car runs insanily rich downlow but gets to about perfect up top.

im not too worryed about the lowish rwkw. the power curve is really nice and it holds peak power quite well.

not sure what timing i was running on the day.

its about the same power of a stock r32 GTST

rb30dedyno.jpg

rb30deafdyno.jpg

so what are your guys opinions of the over all result?

overall im happy with it. alot of people are impressed with it.

now all i need is some coil overs to sort out the handling and somthing to sort out the A/F ratio to lean it out down low.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110112-rb30de-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

it is a lovly power curve even if i do say so myself. interesting how the peak Kw stays there for pretty much 2000rpm...

its impressed everybody that has been in it so far. but most importantly im happy :mad:

haha yup its plenty of fun.. its going to be interesting on 205 crap tyres at the drags tomorow on a bad surface with gravel cus its a airport runway.

i already spun them up accidently with out even trying.. stupid torque.. haha

yeah not sure weather to get safc or just to go for a ecu.. but then i need to get my other mods.

first of all i need some $$ :no:

torque is only like that due to the air fuel ratio being so rich down low and the tune isnt right. once i get a air fuel controler it should be alot smoother.

there is a good write up with pics in the thread "my rb30de"

heres the basic specs anyway.

compression is 10.43:1, stock r33 rb25de ecu, custom extractors and 2.5" mandrel bent exhuast.

intake is just a stock rb25de pleninum with custom 3" intake pipe and pod filter.

stock injectors, fuel pump, cams. runs VVT or VCT

haha how fun it is to be spinning up through first, 2nd and half of 3rd in the drags even when your only launching at 1500rpm. sittin on the spot at 3500rpm

the surface of the track was absoule crap with plenty of gravel. my best time for the 200m was 10.5 still good fun tho :)

torque is only like that due to the air fuel ratio being so rich down low and the tune isnt right. once i get a air fuel controler it should be alot smoother.

Hey Geoff - thanks again for the blat, I've always wanted to see what an RB30DE felt like... I love the effect having the motor balanced has had on the old RB30E bottom end :dry: Sounded very nice as well, particularly the induction noise.

Going in the car you can tell the motor would like to make a bit more grunt with some tuning.

FYI though - that dyno graph doesn't show your car running rich down low, it shows you running lean... then dropping down to a safer but still a bit lean air fuel ratio. So yeah, if you get an S-AFC - if you're going to make any adjustments before putting it on the dyno... bump up your fuelling down low.

GDAY . Those figures seem ok to me . High performance imports magazine got close to that figure with an r33 rb25det after a good tune and a few minor mods .

My engine is very close to what you have , and my times at the drags ( 1/4 mile ) are near identical to what a stock r33 rb25det should do .

The difference in my engine is 370 cc rb25det injectors , twin throttle bodies and i run an apexi safc 2 .

Edited by dondesoto

cheers lith

the only reason i thought it was running rich was cus thats what andre told me. plus that would explain the poor fuel econmany even on long distance driving. but then again that might be down to the tune of the car plus being an auto ecu...

yeah don im now sorta aiming towards your mods to help gain performance etc. i will be interested to see your dyno results when you get yours done. how long till you do your one? how did you tune the safc?

cheers lith

the only reason i thought it was running rich was cus thats what andre told me. plus that would explain the poor fuel econmany even on long distance driving. but then again that might be down to the tune of the car plus being an auto ecu...

yeah don im now sorta aiming towards your mods to help gain performance etc. i will be interested to see your dyno results when you get yours done. how long till you do your one? how did you tune the safc?

i been thinkin about getting it dynoed for the last 2 years , cant rush these things .

the safc tuning kind of guessing . As i run a rb25de ecu and i have an engine 20 % bigger , i justed figured it needed at least 20 % more fuel plus a bit more for having more air via the 2 x throttle bodies and extractors . From idle to around 3000 rpm it has an extra 10 up to 30 % at high throttle 3000rpm and above 30 % . low throttle settings are all set at 5% below this

i been thinkin about getting it dynoed for the last 2 years , cant rush these things .

the safc tuning kind of guessing . As i run a rb25de ecu and i have an engine 20 % bigger , i justed figured it needed at least 20 % more fuel plus a bit more for having more air via the 2 x throttle bodies and extractors . From idle to around 3000 rpm it has an extra 10 up to 30 % at high throttle 3000rpm and above 30 % . low throttle settings are all set at 5% below this

get it dynoed and tune it at the same time

most prfessional dyno guys have lots of experience with dyno tuning and u might find a better result after a couple hours on the dyno tuning the ecu/safc2 properly

then at the salt lake trials u might run ur magic number of 240kph

Edited by usherly

yeah i have now realised its running lean. i had to sit down and think plus listen to my mate lith and then understand the airfuel ratio.

iv knocked back the timing a little just to be safe. but i need to get an airfuel controler to sort it out properly.

still got a slight oil leak.. but i have found where it is now.. stupid external oil feed this time down by the oil pressure sender so thats gona be fun to get at.... now i have learnt to lock tight on everything...

GDAY . Those figures seem ok to me . High performance imports magazine got close to that figure with an r33 rb25det after a good tune and a few minor mods .

My engine is very close to what you have , and my times at the drags ( 1/4 mile ) are near identical to what a stock r33 rb25det should do .

The difference in my engine is 370 cc rb25det injectors , twin throttle bodies and i run an apexi safc 2 .

AHA got that wrong . i dug out that magazine i quoted from HPI 48 . They tested a r3 4 door auto RB25DE and base figure was 105 rwkw . They played with timing , air intake and tried a fuel cut defender and got it up to 121 rwkw .

true true. yeah you can gain a bit of power with a good tune and good timing easy. thats what mine needs.

i will probly get mine dyno tuned once i have the bits i need to get this all sorted. i.e rb25det injectors and air/fuel ratio controler

hehe damn it sounds scary in tunnels :(

AHA got that wrong . i dug out that magazine i quoted from HPI 48 . They tested a r3 4 door auto RB25DE and base figure was 105 rwkw . They played with timing , air intake and tried a fuel cut defender and got it up to 121 rwkw .

Dondesoto: can u pls scan the page and upload them?

thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...