Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Last time I was @ SST for a dyno, the car was stock (completely, not even an aftermarket exhaust or pod) and managed only 97kw@wheels, after fitting a c-red apexi n1 lookalike cat back exhaust it rose to 115kw@wheels (small advance via the CAS). Since then the blitz spec s EBC has gone in, a HKS green pod and now the trust fmic and my cars pulling 175kw@wheels (with no pod, the HKS unit is leaning the fuel curve out a bit too much at the top end, might go for one of those $25 hurricanes). An interesting fact as well is my EBC (for some odd reason... gonna have to get speedworks to check it) is not holding 12psi of boost (though it reads it). At around 5500-6000 (when the valve timing cuts in) its dropping to around 9psi. So with a better pod, a bit more advance (as the cooler is doing more than enough keeping intake temps down) and the ebc holding 13psi flat it should crack 200kw@wheels. Either way I look at how much money I've spent I think its more than worth every dollar. I'll also be looking at the dump+front pipe soon too, as thats causing flow restrictions. So I've picked up 60kw@wheels, thats over 50% more power... although I've spent a fair bit, I'm sure you could get simular results spending less too, just look at rev210, nobody's been able to beat him yet with a stock turbo or intercooler :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

rob,

It was quite a decent power improvement, I'd suggest the dump pipe would be a good idea, cause the exhaust will limit how much power is produced. Still it was a good improvement, and nice to see that your money has paid off.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-183323
Share on other sites

VERY nice rob! 175kw atw is nothing to sneeze at.....

Kinda makes me wonder what my car can pull on 12.5psi of boost, i've pretty much got the same as you, 'cept the new cooler of course.

POD, zorst, boost (10-11psi)

I reckon I could up the boost to 12.5-13psi without it pinging....

gotta organise that dyno day for SAU and see what figures people get!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-183742
Share on other sites

Good work although i seriously doubt you will get 200kw at 13psi on ssts dyno.

Your not losing boost from the EBC thats what they [email protected] boost!

You dont have a dump pipe yet that will restrict boost id be looking their first..

You must be deep into the 13s now Rob :)

Oh..I still have that TRUST Front pipe (not dump) 3 inch ive just sandblasted and painted it, someones looking at it but hasnt gotten back to me yet $200

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-183863
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Works Auto

HAd my car dynoed last week at SST .

First run was 250 with the HKS POD FILTER ON  .

Was running at 12.5 a/f ratio which is ok , but steve rekons thats a bit too lean.

Took the HKS pod filter off and it ran 252hp at 11.5 a/f ratio which is spot on he rekons.

What sort of ecu remap have you got?

I've heard that the R33 can use a remapped R32 ecu if you ditch the VVT.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-183989
Share on other sites

The reason rob went back to Steve, other than the offer of free dyno run, was that he had previously had a run on there before and so could accurately guage the power imporvement. It doesn't matter who's dyno you choose aslong as you stick to the same one. It's not the final power that impresses anyone, it's the increase from you mods on the same dyno.

To go from 115rwkW to 175rwkW is a huge improvement, and with a few more simple mods to go could get close to the magical 200rwkW.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-184015
Share on other sites

So what some of you are saying is that restrictive PODs can affect A/F ratio's.

One would think that my car running rich as hell, by removing my filter and reconnecting the stock BOV, i'd get a better time ?

The excess air being dumped from the blitz can't be good for A/F ratio's right ?

Help me understand!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-184109
Share on other sites

The pods are reducing the cooling effect on the hot-wire(AFM) and therefore the fuel ratio's are on the lean side. This can all be fixed with an S-AFC of aftermarket computer, but changing pods is a cheap alternative.

The stock BOV's are fine, and can be used even in high horspeower apps, they also help reduce compressor surge. I never had any issue with my Blitz BOV, but many people do, as it confuses the AFM into thinking it needs more fuel, hence why peopl have stalling problems.

Did that help?

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11085-dyno-figures/#findComment-184128
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...