Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ceramic wheel in there.Dump raised boost to 15.5psi thru the mid and 12 from 6200 up so we dropped it back to 12.5 thru the mid with boost falling to 11psi thru the top as Skylines do.

Better mid power but no different up top. Power 299.1rwhp @ 11-1 afr still going over 300 @12-1 but the topend timing hits 22deg from 6500rpm being the reason it picks up 10-15hp but we dont want that much timing so its time for an ECU because we all know leaning out an SAFC also adds timing.

Dont know why this car is better than average but the owner says its quicker than other more modifyed R33s and i spose thats more of a test than a Dyno run.

Who cares about dyno figures. Take it to the track, if it runs the MPH consistant with that power, then you know for sure it's a freaker.

Until then, its just another dyno figure from a single source.

but the raw power of a dyno printout is awesome!!!!!!

....then the x-man spun round and with his mighty hand he shoved the dyno printout in the face of his enemy!

Stuck by the awesome power of it's reflex paper cheapness the enemy was blown backwards through the air to land 10 feet away in a crumpled heap.

AMAZING!

' date='5 Apr 2006, 02:39 AM' post='2072085']

Who cares about dyno figures. Take it to the track, if it runs the MPH consistant with that power, then you know for sure it's a freaker.

Until then, its just another dyno figure from a single source.

It is true this is the only dyno the car has been on, but for years it has been whoppin my R33's arse... exact same mods yet always pulls away....I am sure I was even running more boost!!. It is the same with heaps of other modified R33's out there. Cruises, on the way home from a car show whatever, always pulls away. You really need to ride/drive it and you can feel that it pulls harder than a similar modded R33.

I am sure he would chuck it on another dyno --- your shout of course :laugh:

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1143205919.jpg

well to prove that my one is truthful here is the dyno sheet!!! 302rwhp!!!

To bring back an old post.

That dyno graph has intake temp of 53 deg and ambient of 25 thats a large spread and will increase the HP reading noticably. Thats almost a full 30 degree increase.

Yes it does thats the point.

Shootout takes the ambient temp and adds a correction based on the inlet temp. To try and give a consistent reading taking away temperature variables. So on a different temp day you get the same HP reading.

So a large gap between the two numbers means the dyno will add Correction IE adding HP.

To bring back an old post.

That dyno graph has intake temp of 53 deg and ambient of 25 thats a large spread and will increase the HP reading noticably. Thats almost a full 30 degree increase.

Well actually that was my dyno graph...which is totally different to the car they are talking about right now!!!

If an airfilter has 30deg higher than ambiant then we still have to put the probe at the filter,its in the guidelines.HIPSI can check the temp difference on this car but i think its about 16deg.Wildcats cars 300rwhp was backed up on another dyno (Hyperdrive i think)

My Dyno seems to be one of the lowest reading at the moment with an average of 8 to 10% less than Xspeed and Hyperdrives Shootout graphs so im getting it checked as Dyno dynamics are in town for the show this weekend.Ill post the result.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
    • Sweet, yeah hoping stock gears will hold up. May use the transbrake feature on hill climb starts so that will test it.
    • Yeah, the thread is only nearly 20 years old.
    • Been down in Tassie for 2 weeks (a cruise, not a race for once) but spent a little time on her when I got back. I worked out the injector settings in the PowerFC were not correct for nismo 555s, set those to 66% +10ms and added a little air at closed throttle, set the timing (approximately, because it has some weird non 15o cells around idle) and now she starts and idles properly. She purrs like a kitten (ignore the co2 alarm in the background, I did  ) 20250518_171052.mp4 Next step, off for run-in, tuning and alignment!
×
×
  • Create New...