Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wolf3d accepts an external map/maf sensor input

it regards it's own map sensor as the "internal sensor"

So all you do is wire up the afm to the external input, i don't imagine you need anything special to do this. there are 3 pins on the ecu you need to use...

-signal +5v

-signal ground

-external MAF/MAP sensor

So once you have that set up, ecu will let you choose between Internal/External for

-Primary load source

-transient sensor (to detect enrichment and enleanment on fast load changes)

not sure about 2 afm's, but you should be able to just wire up one of the afm's and change the relavent table.... nothing wrong with doing that

just to add.

yes you might struggle to find an out-of-the-box solution for rb26dett. checking their website, i don't think they have a kit for it, which means you'll most likely have to manually wire it up. Which would be a pain!!

in any case, i really don't see the problem with using a MAP sensor, what you and sk are saying is true, but when examining a couple of graphs i've plotted from my car's

TP vs RPM with boost overlaid on the graph, in most cases when boost is constant, TP is also constant (using afm as the input source), so it doesn't really matter if it's a 20:1 mapping or whatever, there is only one line on the map that it needs at full boost..... this might not be true on other cars, but for all the data i've got from my car it seems to be the case.

Here is how to download the calibration file:

1. You will need to build a very simple cable as per attached pic. No level converter or electronic components required

2. Plug cable to grey socket on your F-con V Pro and other end to serial port on your PC

3. Use attached software to download the calibration file

An orange light will come up on your F-con while downloading the file.

Enjoy, share it with the world and post your files here.

Tom

Wolf has a GTR plugin and have for a few years.Theres lots of plugins from Wolf but the web page is a long way out of date.Many jap cars are covered and not BMW and Porsche etc They are now a lot better than some ppl want them to be and older V4s are upgradable.

I have done 1000cc injectors without drama and they run without resistors on low impedance injectors.Very strong contenders in the market with some very advanced features in the pipe line.

Competition in the market is a good thing making everyone work hard to stay current.

I would have to agree that the wolf site hasnt been updated for a very very long time.

I heard last year about data logging for wolf and searched there site last week and found nothing. Emailed Steve and received a beta test version same day. They really ought to update the thing.

There magazine ads do show the GTR etc plug ins though.

well i gave it a try but the light didnt come on and the file saved is blank.

just to check the pins you've used on that 9 pin connector are 5-green 3-yellow and 2-black right?

and stop hijacking this thread with wolf crap! :P

Guest Mashrock
well i gave it a try but the light didnt come on and the file saved is blank.

just to check the pins you've used on that 9 pin connector are 5-green 3-yellow and 2-black right?

and stop hijacking this thread with wolf crap! :P

i would have been asking the same question come next week..

have you got a better photo of them pins on that plug..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...