Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

12.5 @ 115mph on M/T WSID Wednesday night R33 GTS Skyline 9-3-2011

default.jpg

Skyline R33 9-3-2011 @ WSID Wednesday night Burnout after running 12.5 @115mph

tyres on the back are off a R34 GTT 235/45/17 they were like new untill then

default.jpg

Edited by madr33
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 weeks later...

I ran this time ages ago, 24/9/2011

Stagea 260RS

60': 1.929

ET: 12.34

Kph: 181.64

Did this in full street trim, on 19's with streached rubber, a full tank of fuel and jack/tools/spare.

Managed to get some pretty epic wheel spin the first few runs and i'm keen to see what i can get with 18's, better rubber and a lower 60' time

  • 6 months later...

R33 GTSt 25/30 380ish Killerwasps

60ft 2.150

330 5.698

1/8 8.260

mph 99.77

1000 10.403

1/4 12.147

mph 130.38

Hankooks RS3

Good top end but I cannot seem to get off the line well due to wheel spin.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

32 gtr with old Nexens, N1 turbos, exhaust, pods, 1530kgs, plus me:

60ft- 1.78

1/8- 7.72

1/4- 12.075

Mph- 112

Was hoping to go about 12.2, so was stoked!!

Nice work! I think I saw one of your runs.

32 GTRs still the best looking car out there! :)

R32 GTR
i ran 11.8 twice on the stock turbos & stock ecu
16psi
Evc 6
turboback exhaust.
Ku31's

234rwkw ( unigroup dyno )

1.7 60ft @ 116 mph.
lil video in my page http://www.youtube.com/user/sultanaz69/videos
time slip in the description of the video
i suggest if you watch it turn down the volume after i drag because i get a phone call and i get a lil excited.

Cheers

Edited by sultanaz

R32 GTR

i ran 11.8 twice on the stock turbos & stock ecu

16psi

Evc 6

turboback exhaust.

Ku31's

234rwkw ( unigroup dyno )

1.7 60ft @ 116 mph.

lil video in my page http://www.youtube.com/user/sultanaz69/videos

time slip in the description of the video

i suggest if you watch it turn down the volume after i drag because i get a phone call and i get a lil excited.

Cheers

Good run mate, congrats!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...