Jump to content
SAU Community

Skyline Weight Debate

Primordial
 Share

Recommended Posts

Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
Posted (edited)

A lot of people mention the extra weight of the R34 and R33 over the R32.

How much real world difference does extra kilos make to the performance of a car? Obviously less weight means more speed and better handling.

So considering the R33 GTS-T is 3.7% heavier than the R32 GTS-T, would this mean that the R32 is exactly 3.7% faster than an R33? (obviously comparing cars with exactly the same tyres, suspension etc etc).

If this is the case, then 3.7% isn't much difference IMO - I think driver skill would 'outweigh' this small percentage when it comes to any type of competition, be it track or drag events!

Here are the KERBweights I've found for each model:

R32 GTS-T - 1320kg

R33 GTS-T - 1370kg

R34 GT-T - 1410kg

R32 GTR - 1480kg

R33 GTR - 1530kg

R34 GTR - 1540kg

What do you think?

Edited by Primordial
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/111689-skyline-weight-debate/
Share on other sites
predator Grand Master

predator

Posted
Posted

slightly different wheelbase.. way the power is delivered to the ground due to the chasis design, weight balance, different gearbox ratios, engine toruqe, even aerodynamics, etc.

It's silly to say "R33 weighs <this>" as well, as s1 and s2 are usually different, etc, etc.. I know series1 R32 (89/90) is about 40kg lighter than series 2 (91-92)

Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Ok.. ill rephrase my initial question.. I just didnt want this to end up another series vs series thread!

How much difference does X amount of weight make in the REAL WORLD. People talk about the R33 as a 'boat' etc. But how much actual performance difference/benefit is there as a result - NOT including other factors of course.

Im not talking specific numbers, just your opinion of whether a small amount of weight makes a difference in the performance of a car

Edited by Primordial
Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted (edited)
A lot of people mention the extra weight of the R34 and R33 over the R32.

How much real world difference does extra kilos make to the performance of a car? Obviously less weight means more speed and better handling.

So considering the R33 GTS-T is 3.7% heavier than the R32 GTS-T, would this mean that the R32 is exactly 3.7% faster than an R33? (obviously comparing cars with exactly the same tyres, suspension etc etc).

If this is the case, then 3.7% isn't much difference IMO - I think driver skill would 'outweigh' this small percentage when it comes to any type of competition, be it track or drag events!

Here are the KERBweights I've found for each model:

R32 GTS-T - 1320kg

R33 GTS-T - 1370kg

R34 GT-T - 1410kg

R32 GTR - 1480kg

R33 GTR - 1530kg

R34 GTR - 1540kg

What do you think?

1989/90 R32GTST's weigh 1265 kgs, no sunroof, no ABS

For the same reasons 1989/90 R32GTR's weigh less than 1991/93 R32GTR's

Using engine power to weight is simplistic, you need to take into account the relative transmission losses.

Weight affects more than acceleration, there is also braking and cornering to be considered if you are looking at circuit work. There is also the effect of where the extra weight is. The extra ~200 kgs carried by a GTR is mostly on the front wheels, that has a big effect on how they handle.

Take a look at the success ballast applied to certain forms of racing, 40 kgs will take you from the front to the back of the grid.

:D cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid
nizmo_freek Experienced

nizmo_freek

Posted
Posted

My 1989 r32 gtst 4door auto,with sunroof and a full tank of gas in full street trim weighed 1390kg, so im guessing it would weigh about 1320-1330kg dry, anyone else weighed there car??

IOWNU Grand Master

IOWNU

Posted
Posted
yeah im with primordial, y do they say that 33 is too heavy wen in fact a stronger engine helps out balance the weight. why call 33 a boat? wen the 34 is heavier?

I think people say that because of the way they look, rather than how they go.

kralster Veteran

kralster

Posted
Posted

You've also gotta remember it's not all about the total weight it's about where it is. For example if anyone here has driven an old porsche 911 you will know what it's like with that huge amount of weight sitting behind the rear axle. It's like a pendulum and when the rear steps out it's very hard to catch. It also makes the front end very flighty and not seem as grounded. Compare that to a porsche boxer with agrubly the best place for an engine (midship) and you'll understand.

So if a car weighs more also think about where it carry's it's weight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LegendGTR
      EFR7670 exhaust selection RB26

      By LegendGTR · Posted

      I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • PranK
      Stock Airbox and Snorkle for RWC - VIC west

      By PranK · Posted

      Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • PranK
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By PranK · Posted

      This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • Duncan
      7 Speed Auto transmission fluid change (Skyline, Q50, Q60, Fuga, Q70, A62 Titan and probably heaps of others including Navara...)

      By Duncan · Posted

      So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • Duncan
      7 Speed Auto transmission fluid change (Skyline, Q50, Q60, Fuga, Q70, A62 Titan and probably heaps of others including Navara...)

      By Duncan · Posted

      OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...