Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

they still handle ok

my ex has a sc300 n it aint too bad, hangs it round corners, steers where u want it to but it does feel like a boat when ur giving it stick around some hills. u can def feel the extra weight

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'll comment on my personal experience with both since I've had it. I own a (was stock) modified R33 and my brother owns a TT Soarer running 14psi and that's it. No zorst, no pod, just boost.

Stock for stock, the auto Soarer is faster than the manual R33 in a straight line by far.

Modified, my 240rwkw has a far superior top end to the Soarer but with stock turbos on 14psi his car really pulls hard off the line. The power of the Soarer with boost and nothing else is far superior to what you'd achieve with an RB25.

1jz > RB25 easily

But...

Skyline > Soarer (in my opinion) as they're lighter, nimbler, look better, far easier to come across in a manual. I chose the Skyline when I had the choice. He chose the Soarer and regrets it because it's so heavy.

An R33 with a 1jz would be the absolute best of both worlds :P

Skyline parts are cheaper and more mechanics know them. More develpoment in tuning them.

not necessarily. A decent replacement rb25det ur lookin at at least 3K, you can get a 1jz for almost half that!! (supply demand i guess, plenty of blowing up rb's to cater for i guess).

And as someone said i chose the r33 cos it was lighter and easier to find in a manual, and was a better overall package. I found one manual soarer for sale in qld at the time and it was 30 grand..

Would seriously consider a 1jz swap if my rb crapped out...

I guess if you can find a low end model that doesnt have all the extra crap, manual turbo, and played with the suspsension I think the soarer would kick arse. Toyotas from what I have seen anyway are much better cars than most nissans.

But the way I see it is, one is a sports car (skyline) the other is a GT car (soarer) but with money you could change that with both of them.

In terms of the engine, the 1j is just better. Cant compair them I dont think.

Tuners know them too, parts are ok. Yes there are less of them, so less parts, but they dont break so I would think demand would be less.

w00t .. jzx90 and jzx100 chasers are far better looking than a r33 sedan imo... definatley no camrys. I'd say they look like a bmw or something euro..

I used to have a mx83 cressida which is the same shape as the jzx80 chaser/cresta/mark 2. They weigh about 1400kgs, the later models (x90 and x100's ) are pushing 1500kgs depending on what options. Faster than a soarer, i remember hpi said the manual chaser was hard to get off the line and the auto ended up being faster across the quarter mile.

oh and unfortunatley the chasers are pretty rare. Not all of them over here have a 1jz, some a diesel versions with shoddy interior and live axle rear ends :O

x90 should set you back around 20 grandish? x100's seem to be about 24-28, a bit more for a manual if you're lucky to find one.top1.jpg

94-95 model

3241.jpg

specs

Engine Code 1JZ-GTE

Engine Type Water cooled Inline 6 cylinder DOHC 24 valve twin turbo

Engine Size 2.5 litres (2491 cc)

Bore × stroke 86mm × 71.5mm

Compression ratio 8.5:1

Fuel system

Max power 206kW @ 6200rpm

Max torque 363Nm @ 4800rpm

Forced Induction Twin turbo

Fuel Tank Capacity 70 litres

Fuel type Unleaded premium gasoline

Fuel Consumption 11.0 l/100km

Transmission 5 speed manual

Drive Layout FR

Steering Type Power assisted rack & pinion

Front Suspension ƒ_ƒuƒ‹ƒEƒCƒbƒVƒ...ƒ{[ƒ" type coil spring (stabilizer to attach)

Rear suspension ƒ_ƒuƒ‹ƒEƒCƒbƒVƒ...ƒ{[ƒ" type coil spring (stabilizer to attach)

Front brakes Ventilated disk

Rear brakes Ventilated disk

Front tyres 205/55r16 89v

Rear tyres 225/50R16 92v

Turning circle 10.2 m

Exterior Length 4750mm

Exterior Width 1750mm

Exterior Height 1390mm

Interior Length 1990mm

Interior Width 1475mm

Interior Height 1155mm

Wheelbase 2730mm

Front Track 1485mm

Rear Track 1490mm

Ground Clearance 155mm

Weight 1450kg

Standard features Limited slip differential, Front fog lamps, Rear spoiler, Driver airbag, Anti-lock braking system, Traction control, Rear seat lap sash belt, Side impact protection bars, Power windows, Central door locking, Steering wheel reach adjust, Steering wheel height adjust, Leather steering wheel, Wood trim, Alloy wheels

Optional features Front spoiler, Rear window wiper, Navigation system

Colours

[std] Super white II

[Opt] Dark green M.I.O.

[std] Silver metallic

[std] Dark turquoise mica

too camry like and still well in to the $20K region

and more auto's than in the soarers....

I can see your point.

But supras are wider and lower generally and im fairly sure they have a shorter wheel base. A well set up supra handles better than a 33 id imagine.

But I see your point, it would be in the same category for sure

94-95 model

3241.jpg

too camry like and still well in to the $20K region

and more auto's than in the soarers....

These can be had for under 20k now... The problem is finding a manual one. Have seen a couple of drift examples and they can look pretty damn good when done properly.

http://www.importbitz.com/cars.htm

JZX100's seem to be dropping in price too.

The main downer with x90's and x100's is the interior... And x81's for that matter

MY 1JZGTE has done 184000k's on a factory internals, factory cams, factory intake manifold, with just big turbo injectors and ecu i am making 500rwhp through and auto and have done for 2 years, it doesnt blow smoke the catch can has never had a drop of oil in it and im running tens in a big heavy cressida.

show me an rb 25 that has done that.

toyotas are cheaper for parts, a complete engine only costs $500 rb 25s as far as i know cost like $1500. i havent seen a rb25 auto or manual make the power i am with simple bolt ons.

why not?? big power engine in a medium sized coupe

ok, well you said that an "r33 with a 1jz" is "essentially a supra"... its not.

its actually essentially an r33 with a 1jz.

presuming we're talking about a 94/95 supra (in line with the discussion), it never came with a 1jz (came with either 2jz-gte twin turbo or 2jz-ge NA)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...