Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SmoothLine

exactly megs... nark this isnt your fault. For example... This would be like u backing out of your carpark in a parking complex and someone hits you T bone style within your carpark, if u get what i mean, lol, not your fault.

It is illegal to back out of a carpark, by law we must back into a carpark. Notice how after indicating in a car lot the people behind will give you room and time (most times) to back into the space. But if you are coming out of a car spot it is your responsibility to give way to all traffic, and it is easier to do this when driving forward.

If you crash while coming out of a car park it is your fault (No ifs or buts), But if reversing into a spot the person has to give way. :uh-huh:

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the person who was moving at the time is whos fault it is.... if you were reversing and they had moved but stopped and u reversed into them then it is your fault however if you stopped reversing and they kept going it is their fault. from what ive read it is your fault.

Originally posted by akeenan

the person who was moving at the time is whos fault it is.... if you were reversing and they had moved but stopped and u reversed into them then it is your fault however if you stopped reversing and they kept going it is their fault. from what ive read it is your fault.

u dont understand... we were both moving... she pulled in behind me from the other side of the rd while i was reversing str8 back... not out of a car park... i was parking the car by reversing into another spot.

dale - i never really thought about it but the guy who was going to move the "yellow" car seen it.

i'll go tomorow for the finances thing... but i will be telling them that im not paying a cent until i have someone else as in a solicitor look at it due to the unfair reasons that this has come about in

one thing people legal aid will not help you very much If you only have 200 to spare you would be better to pay a solicitor for advise seriously I nearly got ****ed bad If I would have taken legal aids advice I got some proper advicse cost me a couple of hundred but saaved me thousands.

why od you think they are free cause they cant get a job any where

meggala

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...