Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

This 6 Point Roll Cage was previously in a R32 GTR.

Was only used for the race look.

Rubber a bit dirty, may need a good wash or replacing.

Asking $700.00 neg :burnout:

email me at...

[email protected]

Pics here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11380-fs-6-point-roll-cage-for-r32/
Share on other sites

Hi m3m3nto, I'm thinkng along the same lines as Duncan. Generally speaking the Japanese spec cages are too small for our regs. What we need to know is the OD of the pipework and its wall thickness. This is particularly relevant to the main hoop (the one juts behind the drivers head).

Ive been told this cage was only used for the race look. Im not sure if it can been used in legal drags.

I dont know much about them as when I got the car the cage wasnt full installed, The pipe is 4cm and with rubber a good 2inches. Ive been told this the normal size.

I know the main hoop seats behind the drivers head, its seats behind the roof light, so a fair bit away from you head when seated.

I also know your back seat may need some moding to make it fit in with the cage.

I was also told if this was going to be used with drag racing that it would need to pass some test.

The cage fits to the roof but does not push the roof in and the is hardly any gap between roof and cage, fits snug.

Sorry im not the best with this if you need more info plz ask ill do my best to answer.

sorry if i didnt answer ur questions to well

OD = 5inches

The thickness is hard to say as it has no holes to let me measure it, going by the joiners I would say 0.5cm thick im only guessing tho.

Can you let me know the regulations on the cages so i can find out for myself and others.

I will email the guy I got the car off to see if he knows.

Hi M3M3NTO, from memory the CAMS regs for circuit racing is;

Material has to be cold drawn steel tube (CDS).

Tensile strength = 350 MPa min

Main hoop OD = 45 mm with 2.5mm wall thickness

or OD = 50 mm with 2.0 mm wall thickness

other bars OD = 38 mm with 2.5mm wall thickness

or OD = 40 mm with 2.0mm wall thickness

Hope that helps

Cage is....

Main Hoop OD = 40mm with 2.5mm thick

others bars are the same.

This is a Jap cage and is not made for drag racing, the bars are in good condition, rubber needs a clean and has a few marks.

Im asking $700.00 Neg, Aproved Racing Roll Cages are worth well over $1k.

Hey M3M3NTO

I think the "Kid" is trying to say maybe too expensive.... Dunno, but an approved bolt in to meet CAMS X Sydney inc GST around $AUD800.00.

The "race look" is fine and dandy, but maybe this will give you an idea of what the market can stand.

Ciao

you don't need a roll cage to pass Andra unless your running a 10 second 1/4 mile and then it can be a bolt in, if you do 9's it has to be welded in so for your average Joe this cage is fine

and I find it hard to believe that you can buy an approved bolt in for $800

  • 3 weeks later...

It will fit a GTST but u will have to mod the back seat, have to cut a little of each side, ive been told this is easy for people who deal in that stuff.

if you have more questions email me at

[email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...