Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i got an auto 92 gtst with a green label AFM, sumtimes leaving the lights the car stops making power past 3 thou revs, since this is an auto i have to switch the car off and start it again for it to be working fine. my guess is the AFM screwing up, since the things covered with oil, could i be right?? if so how would i clean it without damaging it, got no $$ to buy i new one since i heard they go for around $250+??

cheers guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/115172-what-do-you-use-to-clean-your-afm/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

i cleaned mine last weekend

using contact cleaner

i dunno about not cleaning it well, there was a stack of dirty liquid coming out of it, and the mesh on both sides was left shiny

didnt affect my fuel economy any though

I'm quite adamant at doing this myself... the filament inside the AFM looks REALLY REALLY fragile and sparying brake cleaner/carbycleaner etc onto it doesn't sound right.

Carby Cleaner might come out as a mist, but brake cleaner comes out in a jet-line.

Any thoughts?

I'm quite adamant at doing this myself... the filament inside the AFM looks REALLY REALLY fragile and sparying brake cleaner/carbycleaner etc onto it doesn't sound right.

Carby Cleaner might come out as a mist, but brake cleaner comes out in a jet-line.

Any thoughts?

As an aside Stan, six years ago the 'accepted' means to clean your AFM was to remove the mesh and get stuck in with a cotton-bud and some metho :nyaanyaa:

And I've used the jet-line BrakeKleen three times now, all good. ;)

As an aside Stan, six years ago the 'accepted' means to clean your AFM was to remove the mesh and get stuck in with a cotton-bud and some metho :nyaanyaa:

And I've used the jet-line BrakeKleen three times now, all good. ;)

Go with plastic safe electro contact cleaner. Do not use carb clearner, it will leave a oily layer on the sensor.

no-one on this forum really knows for sure, that's the sad state of affairs.

I've used brake cleaner, but *apparently* it doesn't remove any carbon deposits (worked fine for my afm though)

some people suggest using carby cleaner because it also removes carbon residue. other people claim this is bad because it leaves residue. BUT no-one can explain *what* the residue is, and how it is *bad*, so go figure!!

look, brake cleaner or electrical contact cleaner are both basically the same thing, they are alcohol based, and probably better than mineral based degreasers which can effect some fragile sensors etc. I'd try using them, and if you are having a specific problem and they don't fix it, try replacing AFM's

Using Oiled pod filters (HKS powerflow / foam filters) tends to kill AFM's because the oil coats the afm contact causing bad things to happen.... so if you have one of these, best change it to something else.

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig

This is the specs for the NF contact cleaner, about the best one you can get and the one i'd get:

CRC NF Contact Cleaner is a technically proven stable, inert high purity cleaning solvent, designed to meet today's environmental challenges. This new improved formula is chemically stable, evaporates rapidly, has no flash point and leaves no residue.

Use NF Contact Cleaner for cleaning: PC Boards, Edge connectors, motor and motor controls, contacts and relays, metal switches, sensors, flux removal.

When CRC NF Contact Cleaner is used on lubricated rotating, sliding or stepping contacts it is recommended to apply CRC 2.26 to replace lubrication.

CRC NF Contact Cleaner

Revolutionary Precision Cleaning Solvent.

Instantly removes grease, oil, dirt, flux and other contaminants.

Chemically stable, non-conductive, non-corrosive.

High purity formula evaporates rapidly and leaves no residue.

Strong cleaning action for removal of flux and oils and others contaminants.

No Flash Point. Non flammable.

Does not contain CFC 113 or Methyl Chloroform.

May be harmful to some plastics, e.g. A.B.S. Pebax 2533, Polystyrene etc. Test on small area before using.

This is the more commonly found co contact cleaner, and I'm sure would probably be just as good:

CO Contact Cleaner Plastic Safe Formula is a technically proven, stable, inert high purity cleaning solvent. Non-corrosive, non-staining, rapid-complete evaporation - contains no lubricants. Removes light contaminants, dust, lint, atmospheric/oils, finger prints, moisture from precision electrical/electronic equipment where lower-flashpoint solvents may be used. Leaves no residue to increase resistance. Use as a touch-up supplement for vapour degreasing.

CO Contact Cleaner Plastic Safe Formula used in a planned maintenance programme will eliminate carbon deposits or contaminants that hold moisture and cause corrosion or arcing. An increase in resistance will indicate the frequency of re-application.

Use CRC CO Contact Cleaner for cleaning: Relays, switches, circuit breakers, alarm and signal systems, printed circuit boards, connectors, generators, contacts, laboratory and test equipment, video heads/drums, terminals, plugs and jacks.

It could have been running lean before. Dirty AFM = understated airflow = less fuel input relative to actual amount of air = running lean.

Clean AFM = airflow stated correctly = more fuel input relative to actual amount of air = using more fuel = worse fuel economy.

Maybe?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...