Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had my first dyno run on the R33 GTST done today. The results were a little dissapointing to say the least. This could be due to the fact that the dyno I went to reads low or my car needs an aftermarket computer.

Have a look at the dyno graphs and tell me what you think of it.

Only mods are:

3" Cat back exhaust

11psi boost (bleed valve)

K&N Panel filter in stock air box

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wouldnt be dissapointed tehre are alot of peopel posting optimistic dyno results the main thing is you use the same dyno to compare up grades.

its a pity you graph doesnt show your A/F ratios as this would show you how richyour car is running.

and s-afc is the best remedy if you dont plan huge mods as it makes the car more adjustable.

some dyno shops have to have optimistic results to keep people coming back the dyno that alot of us melbourne people reads fairly low but at least we compare against each other

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201261
Share on other sites

Originally posted by benm

Im sorry but it sounds WAY low to me, with those sort of mods i'd be expecting around 155-160rwkw, but then again all dyno's are different they say.

Yes I agree. Which is why I'll be getting a second dyno run in the near future after I get my injectors cleaned and a full service on a different dyno.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201397
Share on other sites

Consider yourself lucky i only got 124Kw and i have a pod filter, 3"catback, Bleed valve running 10psi, and an SAFC. i was quite disappointed but the guy said my car was mifiring up top. and he said if i regap or change my spark plugs i could prolly get an extra 10Kw or something, he also said the car sounded like a Jet which is not good as it means its restrictive...and he said from his experience it looks like the Cat is holding the car back.. But when i got my car complied i told them to put a Hi flow cat on.. but the guy that tuned my car said from his experience it looks just like a cheap crappy cat!!!.. THE BASTARDS!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201567
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest SupraChigga

My first post here and not a Skyline owner:o

Anyway, I saw DriveBai's post (not trying to get flamed or anything), but if you go here you'll see my dyno figure's.

DriveBai, your dyno tuner is right it must be the cheap cat, have you replaced the cat to a hi-flow yet?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286102
Share on other sites

I'm not real technical with dyno's or engines or anything but 1 thing i noticed is that on your dyno run it only got up to a speed of about 130km/h where as on mine (http://skylines.pnc.com.au/dyno-203rwkw.jpg) the speed got up to 180km/h in 4th gear.

Was your dyno run done in 3rd gear maybe? as all the dyno runs ive seen are in 4th gear at 180km/h.

Thats just my observation anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286128
Share on other sites

I have noticed that many people say they assume their car has X rwkw or whatever ...they then go to the dyno and are dissappointed at the result. Most people over estimate their rwkw by a considerable margin...the car is still the same though, if it felt good to drive before the dyno run...it is still the same afterwards.

I have to say that dyno figures would have to be a very average indicator of on road performance...It is a great way to tune your engine but high rwkw does not by itself relate to a great drive.

I guess my point is dont be dissappointed in your car just because it shows some lower numbers than you expect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...