Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive been asked a few times now about how hard it is to drop the subfram on skylines in order to install these Noltec subframe mounts.

Id like people here to add anything that may help others if they attempt to do this themselves (with help from mates etc...)

Firstly u need a pit or the car up on stands (the rear has to be jacked up on the chassis, not part of the subframe as you are removing it)

Then u need to disconnect the tailshaft. Undo the rear strut tops from the body. (On a GTR the lowers are a U bolt - so they would drop out when the subframe is lowered??) Then clamp the brake line, and hicas line and disconnect them. Now check out your cat back exhaust. If yous is a bolt on sytem, unbolt the rear muffler and your away. If yours is a welded system, just remove from the cat to the rear.

The rear should now be free from the driveline. The only thing left is the 4 bolts going through the actual subframe bushes holding the subframe to the car. Place a jack under either side of the subframe and remove the 4 bolts. I suggest u get hold of an air compressor, as these may be stiff bolts, or may require soaking in Rost off (a silicone creeping spray that works its way into the thread to loosen the bolts)

Once the bolts are out, then have someone on the other jack and together lower the subframe down. If you havent removed the wheels, just roll the whole frame back and away from the car :( Its out now have a break...

Now u need to get the bushes out using either of the 2 methods. First is to use an oxy torch to blow/burn out the bushes. This is extremely smelly, as u will have clouds of black smoke pouring out, so not recommended. Second method is to go down the hardware store and buy a hole saw slightly smaller than the bush. Use it to cut down the hole the bush is in and it should remove most of the bush. There is then a collar that is normally on the outer of the bush (i havent seen the std bushes, so this may or may not be in the subframe, have a look before u install the new ones) See 1st diagram for pics of replacement bush with collar.

If there is the collar in the frame, u need a hacksaw to remove it. Undo 1 end of the blade, push it through the hole, and redo the hacksaw up. Now cut the outer collar out, taking care not to cut the subframe going too far.

Now grease the bush a little, and sit them in where they go (the right way up too) Then using a mallet bang them in.

At this point you can install urethane pinapples to tune (angle) the subframe for traction as well. (see diagram)

All that is left now is to re-install the subframe the way you took it out. Once it has been installed, you may need to bleed the brakes, and the powersteering (hicas).

Please allow a weekend to do this, and have a mate on hand, and a ride organized to go to the hardware store (holesaw). Maybe to repco for brake/ps fluid also.

I find a BBQ and alcohol will have many hands on deck if needed.

Anyone that has done this, or can offer advice please do. Im sure it is the same for GTR and GTST (apart from lower shock mounts, and Attessa - someone help on this?)

later i'll add pics, and get this moved to the tutorial section as well.

Please add any comments or suggestions to help.

post-3692-1147068751.png

post-3692-1147069609.jpg

Edited by Bl4cK32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116840-removing-subframe/
Share on other sites

A couple of minor things -

The brake lines dont need to be taken off. Unbolt them from the hub and leave them wired up to something, one of the little holes in the body work (there are a few under there)

Remove the struts comlpletely as it will just get in the way when you drop the subframe.

As for installing the new bushes with a hammer, i think you will have a few problems. I have recently installed new lower control arm bushes which also have an outer sleeve similar to the ones shown. (though half the size obviously). They are a very very tight fit. I am very doubtful you could get the bushes in without a BIG press and the right dies without damaging them. The lower control arm bushes took 2 guys, a big bench vice and a metre of pipe on the handle to get in. The subframe bushes have over double the surface area of the ones I installed.

Other than that, i think it will be a very worthwhile upgrade once complete.

these will almost certainly require an industrial press to be installed into the subframe. the tricky bit will be getting the subframe onto the press or vice versa. make no mistake it will be a bastard of a job, but by all acounts it will be worthwhile.

http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/97924

Guys heres a s13 subframe with pics on how to do the installation

Would anyone know if the freezer trick would work with the noltec ones? :laugh:

I think the bolt with 2 washers and pressing it in as you do the nuts up would work at least?

Edited by Bl4cK32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...