Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i had a drive in one they go alright once you hit vtecbut yeh nothing compared to the gtst.....all my mates are obcessed with integras but yeh they arnt that good. they are pritty good for a economical car that still goes alright

yeh i had a drive in one they go alright once you hit vtecbut yeh nothing compared to the gtst.....all my mates are obcessed with integras but yeh they arnt that good. they are pritty good for a economical car that still goes alright

I find the integra runs well on the twisties. Not a drag car.

Jon

ahh k yeh the vtirs do handle nicely, only reason i bought it up is ive looked at alot of ppls posts and no one really talks about them and im not sure why. yeh theyr arnt really good for dragging but they are good economically and love the high revs as well!

A GTS-t has a turbo. It takes relatively little effort to dial in more power, compared to a Honda NA engine. Do non GT-R Skylines have "street credential"?

And the reason why no-one talks about them here could possibly be because this isn't a Honda forum. We don't talk about 1920's Packards, De Loreans nor Ascari KZ1's here either.

If there is a vs thread, everyone would tend to go for the top-spec Type-R instead of the silver medalist.

yeh i think they will be better on petrol....would it go as hard as the gtst or not? which one would u prefer?

If you already knew, then why did you ask?

And you're asking on a Skyline forum whether people would prefer a GTS-t over a Honda? Were you expecting an fair and balanced response?

Like scathing said this is the last place people will be raving about hondas if you want more info should check out hondas forums. Also you cant compare a NA against a turbo, cause turbo owns hands down simple. If you want an NA car thats quick, rev high and economical go for the vtir. But if you want something faster and very keen to modify it further to gain more hp then get the gtst. Beacause there are limitation to hondas as they will cost heaps to produce more power (eg turbo charging it).

Edited by JUNR34

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...