Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys since most of us have a copy of this stagea jap service manual i was thinking being 3200 pages long makes it a bitch to try and find stuff, so i thought y not post up little bits of info u find when u are looking through your copy of the manual.

firstly i found that stageas have 2 different diff ratios from the factory... (series 1)

4.083 for all rb25det (4wd) models, and all rb25de (2wd) models

4.363 for all rb25de (4wd) models, and rb20de (2wd) model

so what interesting facts have u found???

Edited by CruiseLiner
thought diff ratios were common knowledge... one is for manual turbo boxes and the other is for auto boxes.

not what the manual says, i edited the first post to include which was which.

my stagea is a 4.3 ratio but an rb25det so either its a rb25de stagea originally or its got rb25de diff gears in it, thats y i thought others might want to know as many said they are all 4.11

it needs to be in seperate sections for each engine car model and turbo and non turbo sections, because the 20 pages in each section on rb20e stageas and rb25de is a pain in the arse and take forever to scan through.

pretty good besides that :)

I noticed that most of the 'core' stagea owners have been active in this thread, so slightly off topic for a moment.. A number of you have asked me for a few bits and pieces (I do a lot of stuff on the computer) so I'm going to put a few common requests up on one of my sites (I HATE uploading things to this site, it takes forever). As I don't want my server to crash with to many people, I'm going to password protect the directory.

PM me with a email address if you want me to send you the link and password. And no, I WILL NOT have stagea manual up, so don't bother if that is what you are after.. :)

Ian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...