Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it worth considering a cheaper run down GTR or should you spend the extra money to track down a good example. I am fairly good with all things mechanical and electrical. I built my LC from a bare shell having nothing at all, not even nuts and bolts to start with. I would find someone to do the motor and gearbox but everything else seems do-able. Am i kidding myself here or what?

really depends how run down... but generally you get what you pay for..

I would rather save up and buy something immac with a very good mechanical report.

If the car is in poor condition you could almost bet the motor is and box are as well... To rebuild those alone would cost you what the car has as a purchase price..

cheap 32gtr's aren't just tired in the engine/driveline, its also everything around it, the interior, paint work, plastic bits, seals.... etc... even if you do all the labour yourself theres still the cost of parts....

IMO no.

If its clapped out its gonna be a case of replace everything.

Motor alone your looking at around 10k as no-one in thier right mind would put ceramic turbos back onto the motor, so the rebuild of 7k, suddenly becomes 10k +

Much the same as doing up an R31 Pintara :) (Sorry Ash, had to be said. Buy you a beer friday)

I think if you can get it cheap enough and really intend to do serious work on the performance then it's the perfect opportunity.

Rebuild the engine to do what you want, do the turbos as Ash said, replace all of the suspension and bushes, do the brakes and give a few areas a freshen up. So far that works to around $15K or less doing it yourself, a perfect opportunity to learn if you have a mate with a clue willing to help for beer. The value of learning is worth IMO. Done yourself the engine rebuild comes to less than 3K plus turbos unless you want more than 400rwkw reliably. Decent rods are then 1.2K and cams another 1K.

Or you could pay the 27-38K that some BS artists are trying to get for their busted a*se old 32's and still have to worry about the time bomb turbos, crapped out or useless Jap suspension and oil pump drive/backing plate problems.

Nope. I wouldve got one a long time ago. I hate the 15 year old rule for allowing these cars to come in. I see so many shack ones driving around or sitting in shops with blown motors/drivelines.

Quite sad.

I remember bout 3-4 years ago , seeing a R32 GTR was like seeing a Ferrari. Now its lucky if they get a second glance or a comment.

Was a dream car of mine, but since has slipped quite far down the ladder.

If you can get a Legitimate 93/94 Model (dont be fooled, ppl pass of 89 models as late model cars) I recommend going for it. You pay for what you get.

depends how much it will be to bring it back to a good condition.

being mechanically minded u can judge the car fairly well i'd assume.

do some figures in ur head and incorporate the time etc.

redoing something urself always ensures that its done right remember.

always better than buying a car with a 'fully rebuild engine 3,000km ago'

good luck with ur search.

I have a 93 model. Its a genuine vspec. done 74,000 kms...

I am considering selling it, but havnt made up my mind 100%.

You are all right.. 89 models and the 15 year rule.. All i have seen is trouble with the guys that bought them

One of my mates bought an 89, but he is a mechanic and knows what he is doing.. still cost him at least $15000 until he was happy with his car.

I'm with Geoff....if you are patient and have time to learn, go for it. Just budget for a rebuild in the first 12 months. Even the motor is pretty straightforward the uppy downy roundy roundy buts are like any other motor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...