Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it worth considering a cheaper run down GTR or should you spend the extra money to track down a good example. I am fairly good with all things mechanical and electrical. I built my LC from a bare shell having nothing at all, not even nuts and bolts to start with. I would find someone to do the motor and gearbox but everything else seems do-able. Am i kidding myself here or what?

really depends how run down... but generally you get what you pay for..

I would rather save up and buy something immac with a very good mechanical report.

If the car is in poor condition you could almost bet the motor is and box are as well... To rebuild those alone would cost you what the car has as a purchase price..

cheap 32gtr's aren't just tired in the engine/driveline, its also everything around it, the interior, paint work, plastic bits, seals.... etc... even if you do all the labour yourself theres still the cost of parts....

IMO no.

If its clapped out its gonna be a case of replace everything.

Motor alone your looking at around 10k as no-one in thier right mind would put ceramic turbos back onto the motor, so the rebuild of 7k, suddenly becomes 10k +

Much the same as doing up an R31 Pintara :) (Sorry Ash, had to be said. Buy you a beer friday)

I think if you can get it cheap enough and really intend to do serious work on the performance then it's the perfect opportunity.

Rebuild the engine to do what you want, do the turbos as Ash said, replace all of the suspension and bushes, do the brakes and give a few areas a freshen up. So far that works to around $15K or less doing it yourself, a perfect opportunity to learn if you have a mate with a clue willing to help for beer. The value of learning is worth IMO. Done yourself the engine rebuild comes to less than 3K plus turbos unless you want more than 400rwkw reliably. Decent rods are then 1.2K and cams another 1K.

Or you could pay the 27-38K that some BS artists are trying to get for their busted a*se old 32's and still have to worry about the time bomb turbos, crapped out or useless Jap suspension and oil pump drive/backing plate problems.

Nope. I wouldve got one a long time ago. I hate the 15 year old rule for allowing these cars to come in. I see so many shack ones driving around or sitting in shops with blown motors/drivelines.

Quite sad.

I remember bout 3-4 years ago , seeing a R32 GTR was like seeing a Ferrari. Now its lucky if they get a second glance or a comment.

Was a dream car of mine, but since has slipped quite far down the ladder.

If you can get a Legitimate 93/94 Model (dont be fooled, ppl pass of 89 models as late model cars) I recommend going for it. You pay for what you get.

depends how much it will be to bring it back to a good condition.

being mechanically minded u can judge the car fairly well i'd assume.

do some figures in ur head and incorporate the time etc.

redoing something urself always ensures that its done right remember.

always better than buying a car with a 'fully rebuild engine 3,000km ago'

good luck with ur search.

I have a 93 model. Its a genuine vspec. done 74,000 kms...

I am considering selling it, but havnt made up my mind 100%.

You are all right.. 89 models and the 15 year rule.. All i have seen is trouble with the guys that bought them

One of my mates bought an 89, but he is a mechanic and knows what he is doing.. still cost him at least $15000 until he was happy with his car.

I'm with Geoff....if you are patient and have time to learn, go for it. Just budget for a rebuild in the first 12 months. Even the motor is pretty straightforward the uppy downy roundy roundy buts are like any other motor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
    • I have an elite 2500 running an adapter harness on an rb25de neo r34. I took the butterfly out and removed all that junk. But I also went Plus+t at the same time. The butterfly thing works in reverse to the boost solenoid on the Gtt if that makes sense
    • yeh they are 235/45/17 up front and 255/40/17 in the rears. I still didn't get my answer if i can fit a 18x9 up front. I want to get 4 of this and see if they will fit before committing as they didn't see an 18x8 as an option but there is a 18x9.5 also.   Enkei RS05-RR 18x9 35mm ET 5x114.3 75.0 Bore Matte Gunmetal Wheel
×
×
  • Create New...