Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They don't last all that long considering I can't resole them but for $50 a pair the one star's are hard to beat. I got maybe 9 months out of my last pair. I looked at using volleys but they are now like $35 a pair and no where near as comfortable

Watch is a Bulova piece, jeans are CK and shoes are either Boss or Julius Marlow - if I choose to keep it cheaper :)

Or head to Lowes and keep it cheaper still.... :blink:

3 pies left... It's only 3 o'clock, forced mentally to do another bake. Blast

You mustn't be baking much considering how long you spend posting

This shoe talk is boring me. I thought this was a car club?

Do you ladies want to go shopping later?

Pfft, this is whoretown...

you guys are just wierd

Volleys, Cons...all crap compared to the old ones. Why must they destroy everything that used to be awesome. I wear steel cap boots every day, and even expensive ones of those are all crap now :(

because rose tinted glasses.

I've been wearing Cons for at least half my life now. I've only had two pairs out of dozens that have lasted me more than 18 months and that is due to me not wearing them often rather than actually lasting well.

I'm a fan of Julius Marlow shoes. The uppers last really well and they have been easy to get resoled as hospitality tends to demolish the soles of shoes between the alcohol and very high milage they get put through.

Although my current work shoes are Converse One Stars :)

Have found Julius Marlows to be quite good. Definitely get the longevity out of them. Windsor Smiths are up there for longevity as well.

Mine are Adidas Superstars. :D

How the heck did you get to 4M posts?!

OMG!!!!! Kinky Nick............ I found a picture of your ex

wkK21_zps03d59df9.png

Sounds about right :P

because rose tinted glasses.

I've been wearing Cons for at least half my life now. I've only had two pairs out of dozens that have lasted me more than 18 months and that is due to me not wearing them often rather than actually lasting well.

ive only had a few cons, have had very little issues as long as you actually get real ones.....but Volleys are a totally different story

because rose tinted glasses.

I've been wearing Cons for at least half my life now. I've only had two pairs out of dozens that have lasted me more than 18 months and that is due to me not wearing them often rather than actually lasting well.

Have had 2 sets of black hi top Converses in 5 years, and I wear them every day.

When you see me Ill either be in:

A. Thongs

B. black hi top converses

C. Black leather Dress shoes

and another 2 gone awol :D (better start counting 'em Chris)

^

No need to count. I know they are all there. These ones wouldn't worry me too much if they went missing. Its some of the other ones that would worry me

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...