Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nick just tell him to go buy a supra. None of this conversion stuff thanks

I heart conversions, do something different... I hate reading performance imports and the like and seeing the same thing over and over bores the shit out of me

Sweet ;) 6.3, what's he got like a 408 Windsor?

The cousin I was just talking about has an xt ('67) ute and an xb gt 4 door as well... I think he's a drug dealer lol

Other mates got a real clean xc ute with a built auto and ratchet shifter as well as an xr6 turbo

Not sure what it was based off. All I know it's for the effort it does not make near enough power. It's in an au ute. Some company made it for him about 10 years ago. Was in Street machine and was meant to go into production but never did.

I usually do at least 60 hours a week. And then got told in a meeting yesterday that we don't do enough. :/

Unless you are getting over 250k you are not being paid enough for those hours.

Not sure what it was based off. All I know it's for the effort it does not make near enough power. It's in an au ute. Some company made it for him about 10 years ago. Was in Street machine and was meant to go into production but never did.

Unless you are getting over 250k you are not being paid enough for those hours.

I do close to 60 hours a week and I'm on way way way way way less than 250 thousand :(

Not sure what it was based off. All I know it's for the effort it does not make near enough power. It's in an au ute. Some company made it for him about 10 years ago. Was in Street machine and was meant to go into production but never did.

Unless you are getting over 250k you are not being paid enough for those hours.

Not on $250k a year. My salary dropped something chronic in the last 12 months. :(

I usually do at least 60 hours a week. And then got told in a meeting yesterday that we don't do enough. :/

You know what the problem is, employers will always want their employees to do "more" work for less or the same money, and employees always want to do less work for more money.

You know what the problem is, employers will always want their employees to do "more" work for less or the same money, and employees always want to do less work for more money.

My salary is directly proportionate to what I bill so have no issues working longer hours.

If I know I need to leave early one day for a club event or whatever, I'll pull in the hours on other days. But to do this and then be told that we're taking the piss and not putting in the hours is a shit statement to make.

Most people are in here from 8-4:30. Im here from 7:30-8ish through till 7-8pm easily.

Most people are in here from 8-4:30. Im here from 7:30-8ish through till 7-8pm easily.

I do 5-1 Monday to Wednesday and 5-7 Thursday Friday and work every second Saturday... I never claim my jobs to be overly difficult but anyone who's worked in customer service/retail will tell you how much it can take out of you

Some humans are wankers

I do 5-1 Monday to Wednesday and 5-7 Thursday Friday and work every second Saturday... I never claim my jobs to be overly difficult but anyone who's worked in customer service/retail will tell you how much it can take out of you

Some humans are wankers

I could never do customer service. Even now I have to deal with people way too much.

I guess when there is no job market your lounge of work can be some what problematic

This as well as a few other factors that have been draining on my time has made life extremely frustrating.

Let's just say that my drop in salary is roughly equivalent to a new decent car...

You know what the problem is, employers will always want their employees to do "more" work for less or the same money, and employees always want to do less work for more money.

LSIOWtt.png

farQ.

I bet if we tallied up the hours you spent on here whilst working that '60hours' a week would suddenly be more like 40 if not less!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...