Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now, before anyone says it's too big and I should get something smaller, I already have the 15" sub. I just need to make a new box for it, because the box that it currently sits in was for my old Commodore and is too big for the Skyline.

I am just wondering where I should mount the new box, and what direction it should face. Am I going to be able to build one big enough and still have it fit in the boot? I'm hoping to built it as square as possible so that I can experiment with sidewards/rearwards facing. With the Commodore box I only had one option, and that was for it to face forwards.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11947-single-15-sub-in-boot/
Share on other sites

JimX,

I think you will have trouble facing it any way except straight up. I have a 42L esky that is 15" high and my R32 bootlid won't close on it. R33 boots might be a bit higher but it would still be a tight fit. If you dont mind losing your spare tyre you could build it into the tyre well and put in a false floor. You could also mount your amps under the false floor on either side for a tidy install look.

Hmm. Well I could angle it upwards slightly to get around the height problem (if there is one). Is this going to affect the sound at all or should it be perpendicular to the surface it's pointing towards?

Dude i have a 15" sub in my boot and believe me it is an absolute b2tch to get it in and out... i have a 100 odd ltr box for mine ported... basically it is a rectangle shape fiting from back to front and with about 30cm on each side of the box for room... i suggest as someone said up a bit, to make a small box without a top that will fit very snug into the wheel well... then build another box of around 45ltr's and join the top of the box in the well to the bottom of this box... then for the top where the sub will be mount make the piece the exact shape of the whole boot so when you put it in the wood touches the edges of the boot all around it, then screw this to the box in the car. It might work out easier if u cut this top sheet into halfs before you put it in otherwise it wont go in... this is how i will be doing my custom boot before showoff, cos this way you have a completely flat boot with sub in the middle and plenty of room for amp's etc... i am going to be installing another 15 and another amp so i'll let ya knpow how it all fits, if it does lol. PS. make sure you put carpet or carboard under the box and ensure all plastic surrounds of the boot are stuck in well cos R33's have shocking boot rattle, especially the rear bar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...