Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here is mine..... only thing left is to get it lowered... its been on the list for a while!

32_sau.jpg

nice, are they the crystal clear indicators?

Do they stick moreso than your headlights and are they a different colour of clear to your headlights?

Mine stand out too much, probably need to use a plastic cleaner on the headlights :laugh:

nice, are they the crystal clear indicators?

Do they stick moreso than your headlights and are they a different colour of clear to your headlights?

Mine stand out too much, probably need to use a plastic cleaner on the headlights :laugh:

Thanks,

not sure what you mean by crystal clear indicators. I bought them while i was in japan, they are just clear plastic and yeah pretty much same as headlights and they sit pretty flush, the original orange indicators the car came with didnt sit 100% flush and perfect either.

But I really like the clear indicators, glad i bought them.

Thanks,

not sure what you mean by crystal clear indicators. I bought them while i was in japan, they are just clear plastic and yeah pretty much same as headlights and they sit pretty flush, the original orange indicators the car came with didnt sit 100% flush and perfect either.

But I really like the clear indicators, glad i bought them.

will have to see in person :sleep:

Do you live in Melbourne?

Here is mine..... only thing left is to get it lowered... its been on the list for a while!

*edit - sorry about the quality its only phone camera

damn nice, though it does need to be a bit lower.

i especially like the front bar. oh and wat rims are they?

the advans are awesome rims! just wanted something different.

yea black spokes with the polish lip would look sweet on your car r32_gts4

Nice ride stryder! very unique with those doors!

Edited by SoFly
hmmm i dunno why but i actually prefer your older rims SoFly ^^ still tough though. alot of people don't seem to like those advans but i actually love em!

DSC_0830.JPG

:) ^^ make the rims black though and leave the lips steel :P like the ones on RB_turbo_bitch's car :P

NICE KIT GOES REALLY WELL WIF THE CAR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...