Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was luckier still, my car has no side indicators and the seatbelt holder thing still in (personal import)

But for normal compliance they have to break that seatbelt holder thing as they have to change to Aus seatbelts.. mine still has the Jap ones in it.

with those side indicators, does anyone know if i wanna replace them with the clear ones, which one would be the less mods? cause the indicators that i have it on the front guards are very small ones and and hard to get the after market ones to replace it, they quite big. if i want to do it, i'll have to cut/enlarge the holes for them to be fitted!

cheers

post-256-1212481473.jpg

My shitbox... pre-prep and paint.

Hey Shan, where are you getting your body work done ?

Looks like it's piecing together nicely, i'll have to have a read of your 'epic build' thread...............

Edited by SNISMO
with those side indicators, does anyone know if i wanna replace them with the clear ones, which one would be the less mods? cause the indicators that i have it on the front guards are very small ones and and hard to get the after market ones to replace it, they quite big. if i want to do it, i'll have to cut/enlarge the holes for them to be fitted!

cheers

Holden VT, VX ones may be very similar

They also come out clear from factory

Hey Shan, where are you getting your body work done ?

Looks like it's piecing together nicely, i'll have to have a read of your 'epic build' thread...............

Driftline Racing... in campbellfield, VIC

where is the link to said epic build thread?

And without those seatbelt holders its a bitch to turn around and grab it. Do you guys have 100% stock seatbelts, or are they aus belts that have retained the holder?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ep...ld-t216749.html

I'm running standard japanese belts (put em back in after compliance) with the guide. its such a bitch in an R32 coupe without the guide, your belt always gets caught in the door n stuff.

The new Suzuki swift are fairly small, it's been a while since i looked at one though.

thanks mate, i'll have a look at them when i have chance. also, i'm thinking about the Audi A4, they are very small but just wanna confirm with u guys first before i order/buy them (ther are not cheap!)

cheers

thanks mate,the 89 model doesnt come with theide indicators, i dont like them anyway,

cheers mate

yeah, when I got my '92 GTR complied I was told that. I reckon the side lights spoil the look too; can't understand why authorities insist on having side lights on some models and not others; seem rediculous!!.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...