Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

im having some serious issues with my alarm/immobiliser.

I have a mongoose m80 series

Yesterday, i went down to shops and when i got back to the car i couldnt deactivate the immobiliser with the remote. I tried switching it off at the key switch under the bonnet... still didnt work. After about an hour it decided to work..wether it be a few loose wires i jiggled around under the steering wheel where the alarm box in the car is fitted im not sure. Either way the car started. I needed to go out again this morning and checked the immobiliser was still switched off..and it was. Car started no problem. Go to shops just had to get some milk so i set the timer for about 8 minutes...which would have given me enough time to get back to the car had the immobiliser decided to reactivate itself after the ignition turns off. Sure enough there was a f*k around in the shop and when i got back to the car it was turned off and I couldnt get it started.. the immobiliser had kicked in (dispite the fact i had turned it off with the key) and i couldnt get it off.

I dont have the card that came with the immobiliser with the over write code as my ex had it installed and doesnt know where he has put it.

I ended up getting car towed (lucky my next door neighbour is a tow truck driver) but i need to get it up to newcastle next weekend to have it re-programmed. odviously i cant start the car but hey...at least i know my immobiliser works :P

Just wondering if anyone is familiar with this type of immobiliser and if you know how to manually by-pass it ie with the wires and such.

if anyone can help it would be muchly appreciated!!!

Thanks!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/121828-immobiliser-problems/
Share on other sites

Just wondering if anyone is familiar with this type of immobiliser and if you know how to manually by-pass it ie with the wires and such.

Mate,

Even if there was a way to bypass with wiring etc your alarm/ immobiliser, do you think that writing it in a public forum like this would be a good idea?

It would effectively mean that everyone with that type of system would have it rendered useless as any old car thief could read the how to instructions for a bypass.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...