Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well there are no int gated housings at this stage in that line... still not out from garrett...

So what housing have you had machined up?

What A/R is it?

Is it a R33 rear housing? VG30?

garrett has a line of them in internal gate, its on horsepowerinabox site and racespec site

A/R they have are 0.63, 0.82 and 1.06 i want the 0.63 for quicker spool

and im not to sure what housing it is but mounts onto my t3 manifold

That is a custom made jobby from hpiab. They are a VG30 second hand rear housing from memory.

Garrett is just about to release the intrnal gated GT30R this month. I should find out this week.

In answer to your question though...the turbo will need to be spaced away as the comp housing is rather large. The oil and water lines will need to be made up. I suggest braided. These can be made for around the $250 mark. The inlet will also have to be changed due to the large turbo mouth.The dump pipe angle will also change so you might have to cut it under the car and rotate then re-attach.

As 3lit said, they are not on the market yet.

So you've got the VG rear... alhough im now worried about what comp wheel it has in in...

But on the matter at hand, as 3lit also said, youll have to change all the stuff around it

havent they been out at gcg and unique autosports for ages..... we are talking bout the gt3040 arent we???? if so someone else on here has done it in the stock position i remember lookin at it has the whole install process on photos, i think its in the forced section

Edited by sinistagtst

i havent got it yet aye im just hell interested in buying one when they come out or if they are available atm

for around the 2k mark there the only turbo from garrett that are rated for more than 400hp

well they are a hybrid, not an "offering" from Garrett at all

What about...

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Upgr...pgrade_gtst.htm

Another hybrid, well tested, well proven

well im tossing up between that gcg highflow or a gt30r but gt30r more work to be applied to make it all fit in and running where as the gcg is all staight in straight out

my aim for the car is to get 350 rwhp

GCG Ball Bearing High Flow on the Group Buy for $1750 delivered with all the parts necessary to fit straight on.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=121128

:P cheers :)

If you want 350rwhp an you get the gcg high flow factor in doing your cams as well, I have searched on these forums and not that many high flows have reached your figure of 260 rwkw.

The GT30R will be able to achieve this figure easily with more tuning maybe more, I have had a good look into the two myself. Im going with the GT30 I guess it depends on a few other things though as well like wat are you wating to do with 350rwhp ,track ,drift ,1/4. Wat other supporting mods would be in place to back up the turbo.

well the car is set for track

i have pfc, fmic, pod, z32, ebc, fuel pump and fuel reg, turbo back zorst and when i get the turbo ill get bigger injectors

my car is tuned at 261 hp on a base/safe tune due to my turbo seal goin it cant be tuned for more otherwise bang

*sigh* they are external only.

any internal models are having other housings machined up to suit as the garrett items are not yet released

if people cant understand that yet i give up

have seen a similar turbo low mounted, it was off the new falcon, featured ar.7 compressor cover and ar.82 rear internally gated. extensive modification of the engine mount necessary. plus custom plumbing in speedflow for oil & water feeds and custom dump pipe, intake pipe & intercooler pipe. looks fully standard though, cant pick it other than the large intake pipe.

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well im swaying more to the gcg as there is minimal work and expense to install is and running it

and if this turbo can give me 330-350 rwhp ill be happy :D

cheers

andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
×
×
  • Create New...