Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well there are no int gated housings at this stage in that line... still not out from garrett...

So what housing have you had machined up?

What A/R is it?

Is it a R33 rear housing? VG30?

garrett has a line of them in internal gate, its on horsepowerinabox site and racespec site

A/R they have are 0.63, 0.82 and 1.06 i want the 0.63 for quicker spool

and im not to sure what housing it is but mounts onto my t3 manifold

That is a custom made jobby from hpiab. They are a VG30 second hand rear housing from memory.

Garrett is just about to release the intrnal gated GT30R this month. I should find out this week.

In answer to your question though...the turbo will need to be spaced away as the comp housing is rather large. The oil and water lines will need to be made up. I suggest braided. These can be made for around the $250 mark. The inlet will also have to be changed due to the large turbo mouth.The dump pipe angle will also change so you might have to cut it under the car and rotate then re-attach.

As 3lit said, they are not on the market yet.

So you've got the VG rear... alhough im now worried about what comp wheel it has in in...

But on the matter at hand, as 3lit also said, youll have to change all the stuff around it

havent they been out at gcg and unique autosports for ages..... we are talking bout the gt3040 arent we???? if so someone else on here has done it in the stock position i remember lookin at it has the whole install process on photos, i think its in the forced section

Edited by sinistagtst

i havent got it yet aye im just hell interested in buying one when they come out or if they are available atm

for around the 2k mark there the only turbo from garrett that are rated for more than 400hp

well they are a hybrid, not an "offering" from Garrett at all

What about...

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Upgr...pgrade_gtst.htm

Another hybrid, well tested, well proven

well im tossing up between that gcg highflow or a gt30r but gt30r more work to be applied to make it all fit in and running where as the gcg is all staight in straight out

my aim for the car is to get 350 rwhp

GCG Ball Bearing High Flow on the Group Buy for $1750 delivered with all the parts necessary to fit straight on.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=121128

:P cheers :)

If you want 350rwhp an you get the gcg high flow factor in doing your cams as well, I have searched on these forums and not that many high flows have reached your figure of 260 rwkw.

The GT30R will be able to achieve this figure easily with more tuning maybe more, I have had a good look into the two myself. Im going with the GT30 I guess it depends on a few other things though as well like wat are you wating to do with 350rwhp ,track ,drift ,1/4. Wat other supporting mods would be in place to back up the turbo.

well the car is set for track

i have pfc, fmic, pod, z32, ebc, fuel pump and fuel reg, turbo back zorst and when i get the turbo ill get bigger injectors

my car is tuned at 261 hp on a base/safe tune due to my turbo seal goin it cant be tuned for more otherwise bang

*sigh* they are external only.

any internal models are having other housings machined up to suit as the garrett items are not yet released

if people cant understand that yet i give up

have seen a similar turbo low mounted, it was off the new falcon, featured ar.7 compressor cover and ar.82 rear internally gated. extensive modification of the engine mount necessary. plus custom plumbing in speedflow for oil & water feeds and custom dump pipe, intake pipe & intercooler pipe. looks fully standard though, cant pick it other than the large intake pipe.

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well im swaying more to the gcg as there is minimal work and expense to install is and running it

and if this turbo can give me 330-350 rwhp ill be happy :D

cheers

andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...