Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

just wondering would there be an advantage of using a tyre with a bigger wall e.g (60) for less wheel spin of the line?

for e.g i used my 17/45/235 rims (potenza gIII) last time for the 1/4 mile and it was getting heaps of wheel spin (b/button clutch) if i used a 16/60/215 but flattend to say 16-18psi would it grip more as the tyre has more flex on the wall?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122799-tyre-heightswidth-for-14-mile/
Share on other sites

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

But if you're going with a tyre that has less contact patch, then all you're doing is getting it to a point where the contact patch was the same size as the less flexy but wider tyre.

Obviously the final word will depend on the specific application and would require testing, but logically all I can see happening is you having the same amount of grip.

If you were going to a 235/60 R16 tyre from a 235/45 R17 I'd say yes, but since your "new" tyre choice is narrower I'd say it was pretty line ball (assuming your tyre is the same make and model).

thanks, ye that sounds right, just had a few ppl tell me dont bother with rims (something like a 45 profile) as it will only spin especially with a b/bustton clutch, i will be testing both sets of tyres this saturday so wel see what happends,

has anybody had any Actual experiences were they have compared a both smaller and larger profiles?

The bigger the diameter, the harder it is to spin. The wider the tyre, the more grip. The bigger the profile, the more it will absorb the shock from take off. The lower the pressure, the more it will absorb the shock from take off, and increase contact patch. This is all assuming all other this are equal. Also big burnouts are bad for street tyres, but good for race tyres, if using street tyres, try driving around the water box and just spin the tyres enough to make sure they are clean ie no stones etc.

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

Wrong. By your logic, Top Fuel cars would be using 60" wide slicks with 40mm of sidwall and running the times they are - or better!?!?!?

Think about it logically for a second.

Adrian

ye that right,

so im assuming the 16/215/60 will work betta say at 18-20psi than the 17/235/45?

i think the main problem is the clutch coz it so frictiony and its pretty much impossible to ride and from the take of shock/stress on the small profile just starts spining. the car makes just over 200rwk.

any ideas on a better take of strategy

the 17's are potenza gIII's, and the 16's are good year eagle ga

The width of the tyre also makes a big difference, people often state that to increase grip you should fit a wider tyre, but thats not always true, your cars weight is simply spread over more surface area of tyre with a wider choice, a narrower tyre can actually provide more stability.

Matching your cars gearing to the your tyres diameter is also very important. Genrally the samller the diameter wheel/tyre the better the acceleration, but lower the top speed.

Tyre pressures also effect the cars grip, as does the friction co-efficient of the tyres rubber, the weight on each tyre and the force applied to them.

Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory >_<

Edited by evil_weevil
Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory :D

thats a pretty mad 60'' time man, ye standard clutch is much better than b/button as theres no ride in the clutch its on or off, so wen u try take off at 3-4000rpm ~~~~~

what was your finanal 1/4 mile time with a your 60' at 1.9 and mph?

Usually fitting the widest possible tyre to the rim will give you good traction. You know how some people stretch 225s over 9" rims. Well you want to do the opposite basically. The sidewalls will flex more and the contact patch will be better to begin with too.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

no....I thought it was because I'm such a skillful driver?? hehehehe jokes :whistling:

Some people thought I was running semi's because of the 1.9's.

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :D Awesome

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :laugh: Awesome

i would take them, but i live in melb spuin an need them for saturday,

any special take off techneeks with brass button clutches? were u cant really ride? ive tried hand brake helps a little

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :laugh:

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :D

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :P

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :O

Didn't mean it to sound like a knock, mate. Good work on the times! Just wanted to make the point that the 60' was about right for a more than capable driver on crappy tyres. More of a compliment when i thought it than when i re-read it.

Buy some better rubber champ - you wont know your car!

Adrian

hahaha Oh I know you werent having a go mate, sorry if I came across like that !!

In my old VT LS1 my best was 2.3...hahah

Yep - Going to do some research with the tyre rating thread asap and get some good rubber !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...