Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

just wondering would there be an advantage of using a tyre with a bigger wall e.g (60) for less wheel spin of the line?

for e.g i used my 17/45/235 rims (potenza gIII) last time for the 1/4 mile and it was getting heaps of wheel spin (b/button clutch) if i used a 16/60/215 but flattend to say 16-18psi would it grip more as the tyre has more flex on the wall?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122799-tyre-heightswidth-for-14-mile/
Share on other sites

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

But if you're going with a tyre that has less contact patch, then all you're doing is getting it to a point where the contact patch was the same size as the less flexy but wider tyre.

Obviously the final word will depend on the specific application and would require testing, but logically all I can see happening is you having the same amount of grip.

If you were going to a 235/60 R16 tyre from a 235/45 R17 I'd say yes, but since your "new" tyre choice is narrower I'd say it was pretty line ball (assuming your tyre is the same make and model).

thanks, ye that sounds right, just had a few ppl tell me dont bother with rims (something like a 45 profile) as it will only spin especially with a b/bustton clutch, i will be testing both sets of tyres this saturday so wel see what happends,

has anybody had any Actual experiences were they have compared a both smaller and larger profiles?

The bigger the diameter, the harder it is to spin. The wider the tyre, the more grip. The bigger the profile, the more it will absorb the shock from take off. The lower the pressure, the more it will absorb the shock from take off, and increase contact patch. This is all assuming all other this are equal. Also big burnouts are bad for street tyres, but good for race tyres, if using street tyres, try driving around the water box and just spin the tyres enough to make sure they are clean ie no stones etc.

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

Wrong. By your logic, Top Fuel cars would be using 60" wide slicks with 40mm of sidwall and running the times they are - or better!?!?!?

Think about it logically for a second.

Adrian

ye that right,

so im assuming the 16/215/60 will work betta say at 18-20psi than the 17/235/45?

i think the main problem is the clutch coz it so frictiony and its pretty much impossible to ride and from the take of shock/stress on the small profile just starts spining. the car makes just over 200rwk.

any ideas on a better take of strategy

the 17's are potenza gIII's, and the 16's are good year eagle ga

The width of the tyre also makes a big difference, people often state that to increase grip you should fit a wider tyre, but thats not always true, your cars weight is simply spread over more surface area of tyre with a wider choice, a narrower tyre can actually provide more stability.

Matching your cars gearing to the your tyres diameter is also very important. Genrally the samller the diameter wheel/tyre the better the acceleration, but lower the top speed.

Tyre pressures also effect the cars grip, as does the friction co-efficient of the tyres rubber, the weight on each tyre and the force applied to them.

Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory >_<

Edited by evil_weevil
Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory :D

thats a pretty mad 60'' time man, ye standard clutch is much better than b/button as theres no ride in the clutch its on or off, so wen u try take off at 3-4000rpm ~~~~~

what was your finanal 1/4 mile time with a your 60' at 1.9 and mph?

Usually fitting the widest possible tyre to the rim will give you good traction. You know how some people stretch 225s over 9" rims. Well you want to do the opposite basically. The sidewalls will flex more and the contact patch will be better to begin with too.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

no....I thought it was because I'm such a skillful driver?? hehehehe jokes :whistling:

Some people thought I was running semi's because of the 1.9's.

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :D Awesome

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :laugh: Awesome

i would take them, but i live in melb spuin an need them for saturday,

any special take off techneeks with brass button clutches? were u cant really ride? ive tried hand brake helps a little

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :laugh:

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :D

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :P

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :O

Didn't mean it to sound like a knock, mate. Good work on the times! Just wanted to make the point that the 60' was about right for a more than capable driver on crappy tyres. More of a compliment when i thought it than when i re-read it.

Buy some better rubber champ - you wont know your car!

Adrian

hahaha Oh I know you werent having a go mate, sorry if I came across like that !!

In my old VT LS1 my best was 2.3...hahah

Yep - Going to do some research with the tyre rating thread asap and get some good rubber !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...