Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

My RB20DET plenum arrived yesterday so this weekend i'll be installing it. My question is that when I changed the exhaust manifold I found that i had a bunch of broken exhaust head studs. Am I in for any simular supprises with the intake side of the engine?

Cheers,

Ian

Edited by GTST4Newbie
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122967-installing-an-rb20det-plenum-done/
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I'm still working on modifying the plenum to fit an additional 6 injectors so I can run 2 fuel rails. One with RB20 injectors and the staged set with a set of gtr 440cc injectors. The goal is to be able to get a very economical low end tune on the RB20 injectors but have the fuel for 25lb boost, and 400 Awhp.

I'll pics pics of the progress as it happens.

Cheers,

Ian

  • 2 weeks later...

Well its done..!

It took working on it on and off over 6 days to finish it properly. I had to re-work the water plumbing under the plenum, and also had to remove the hydraulic line from the clutch master cylinder to get it on the engine, but other than that it went on fairly easily.

I took the opportunity to do an oil and plug change, and installed a full flow oil system (cooler and remote filter) at the same time.

Detailing things as i went, the plenum is metalic blue with a lot of clear coats, fuel rail is modified with new 1/8th bsp fittings silver soldered onto it, and painted flat black. The throttle cable is off a R31 skyline, which is about 20cm longer. I also made a alloy throttle cable bracket.

I'll be painting the 4" intake piping the same colour. The rocker covers will be either polished or painted silver metalic, and i'll re-paint the coil cover satin black to finish detailing things.

As for how it works, well its still being tuned. Its certinaly no worst than the stock plenum was. Inside the plenum there is 6 50mm velocity stacks on each port, so it should be a little better in top end flow. It doesn't seem to have sacrificed any low end that i've noticed.

Attached are the before and after pictures...

Cheers,

Ian

post-26553-1152333118.jpg

post-26553-1152333251.jpg

post-26553-1152333278.jpg

post-26553-1152333304.jpg

Edited by GTST4Newbie

Rocker covers will be polished alloy or silver with a clear coat. Coil pack cover will be satin black. Intake pipe will be painted blue like the plenum.

I'll be running 25lb max once i get the 1600cc staged injector installed before the throttle body. Next upgrade is installation of the nismo gmax twin plate clutch i just scored. Hopefully that will happen next week.

Not so much looking for a specific power figure, though around 400hp at all 4 wheels would be nice. I'd like low 12's or better on the 1/4 mile in about 2 weeks...

Cheers,

Ian

Edited by GTST4Newbie

Made by stryder in taiwan. Was a bit of a bitch to install but its worth it now its installed.

Still tuning the car, and am running 1 bar boost with the gtr injectors in it again. All seems good so far.

I'm adding a 1600cc staged injector next weekend so that will allow 24lb and a final tune to around 350 or so hp at the wheels.

Adding a nismo twin plate clutch too some time later this week too...

1600/6 = 266cc per cylinder + a 440cc gtr injector= about 700cc per cylinder.

This means i'll be running all injectors at about 75% duty at the most at max rpm.

I'd maxed out the standard GTR 440cc injectors at 100% duty with a 12:1 AFR with 20lb boost with the last tune at 6500 rpm. More RPM would have meant it would have been around the 14-15:1 AFR at 7500 which would have been a melt down. Thus the addition of a staged injector.

Edited by GTST4Newbie

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Nissan-Skyl...sspagenameZWD2V

But I got mine for $399 USD + freight. Cost me about 550 AUD delivered, and they kindly declared the package as being worth $100 so no import duty or GST etc.

Nice... Good pricing...

What i did dig up is that it uses the standard runners... Damn half english explinations...

Is that true... What throttle body did u end up using?

Edit: I have sent an email to the seller requesting more info. Also they had rb20 and 26 manifold listed but no 25's so i have emailed about that too. Thanks for helping out mate.

did you do any back-to-back testing?

i.e. a run before the manifold was installed, and then again afterwards? would be interesting to see what (if any) difference it makes...

also, where do i find information on this R.I.P.S. manifold i keep hearing about both here and on SDU?

is it worth buying (i.e. are there any power gains) or is it more just the convenience of having the throttle body at the front of the manifold?

reason i ask is there's been results that show that with some manifolds, you will actually go backwards in power/response/flow...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...