Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, been meaning to ask for a while but kept forgetting.

I have a fair idea of cams but not entirely the effect of them according to their lift / degree's.

Ok, so my understanding is that cams have lift, and I assume that this relates to how high the cam goes when rotating. However, I dont know what the degree's mean or how any of this gives different power gains at different RPM... Engine internals are certainly not my strong point.

Thanks

C

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/
Share on other sites

depends on the setup.

usually more lift = more flow, but you also need duration. the problem lies in getting a good combo as at high rpm you can get valve slap, eg over revving. to compensate you can use tougher valve springs etc. but it depends on the lift. if the lift is more than the springs can take the springs will bind, or over compress.. VERY bad.

if you need high revs eg nat asperated, you need less duration more lift... to raise the rev range

use as a guide as this may not be correct to some out there ;)

Edited by bogcock
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275388
Share on other sites

So for an internally-stock GTR, you wouldn't want much lift, is that right? I think the tomei poncams are 262 and 10.2 and are supposed to be good for stock engines with bolt ons.

Thanks for this info too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275394
Share on other sites

poncams are good because they use the stock valvetrain.

if you want big power you will need more lift and around 264 duration..

procams are better, but you need to change valve springs, retainers etc

for a stock gtr (internally) cams wont really give too much benifit. ive seen stock cammed gtrs running 600hp with no problems. attend to other parts 1st, such as turbos, ecu, injectors zorst etc

Edited by bogcock
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275428
Share on other sites

Christian - i went for std turbos, tomei poncams 260 9.15mm.

It made a huge difference to the midrange and drivability.

Someone else on here also did poncams on std turbos...

Full list is:

1.1 bar

turbo back exh

stock airbox, high flow filter

poncams + adj wheels

i reckon area under the curve is pretty good, and low down power...

Dyno_220305.jpg

sure turbos would have made more power, but drivability is very much improved... and I don't drive b/w 5000 - 8000 rpm all the time - 85% if the time is between 2000 and 4000 rpm

don't completely discount cams ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275514
Share on other sites

Yeah between my 2 GTRs I have done mods quite differently but gotten similar power, but the power is very different.

Old GTR;

Power FC

Full Exhaust

More Boost

243rwkw

New GTR;

Cam Gears

FPR

Full Exhaust

More Boost

250rwkw

But the way that power is produced on the new GTR is astounding compared to the old one and I reckon its all cam gears.

Poncams are only $850-ish delivered from Nengun, not sure how much fitting is tho.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275909
Share on other sites

Bit OT - but whats the diff between a PonCam and a ProCam ?

Hi B-Man

I have just been doing similar research on cams also, and have found that while all the specs seem similar on the poncams and low end procams (eg 9.15 lift, similar durations), the procams are apparently a more aggressive "ramp" affecting the speed of valve opening. This means that the procams need the uprated springs where the poncams dont, and presumably affects the power/torque delivery.

The Tomei website has some good info in Engrish describing the cams.

Cheers

Ned

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123200-cams/#findComment-2275926
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...