Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some time ago we back to back tested Castrol FR 5W30 and 10W60 in a race engine (not an RB) on the dyno. Sure the race engine was built “loose” compared to a brand new “standard” road engine, but probably no looser than a 100,000ks’ old road engine. On the dyno there was very little difference in power output at all rpm ranges, with the 5W30 slightly ahead. But in real world conditions I don’t think you would ever notice the power or fuel consumption differences.

So I have continued to use the 10W60 in my road cars (and race cars) for the temperature safety margin it gives me.

:kiss: cheers :rofl:

PS; I didn't notice any significant oil pressure differences at normal operating temperatures, the oil pressure relief valve controls that.

Edited by Sydneykid

With the 5w40 Motul gear, over 3500rpm its a smidge under 6kgcm2... I should walk out to the car and have a look what units the std guage use.. lol

SK, to back up what you are saying I have seen on the net somewhere a dyno back to back with different oils in a subaru turbo thing, the castrol 10w60 actually made more power than some of the other lighter weight oils (splitting hairs type results, but none the less it wasn't less power), if I remember correctly better than the majority of 5w40/5w50 oils with the only one beating it being the mobil 1 0w40.

I would have kept running the 10w60 but was concerned with such high oil pressure, I must admit fuel economy is the same between oils.

Just cruising at 100km/h it was sitting damn close to 6kgcm/2 vs the 5w40 that sits on roughly 4.5..

Busky2k, I remember when whatsisname was running the motul 300v 10w40 in his close to 300rwkw rb25, he ended up moving to the 300v 15w50 as the 10w40 was not cutting it, how he knew this im not sure.

PS; I didn't notice any significant oil pressure differences at normal operating temperatures, the oil pressure relief valve controls that.

Yes very true , but it really depends on the engine too. Some go into relief just off idle. Others don't until 5000rpm etc. So different viscosities behave differently between engines. For example a 10W60 might go into relief at 4000rpm, but a 10W30 in the same motor might not go into relief until 6000rpm. So the latter oil would provide more flow for the same pressure.

Whilst the fuel economy benefits between thick and thin are small, they are definitely there but we're not talking say a trend you could see just over 1 tankful. For example, an ILSAC GF-4 rated oil must show 2% (IIRC) better fuel economy than a refererence fully synthetic 10W30. Moreover, many manufacturers in the USA are moving to 5W20 purely for fuel economy reasons. I believe people who would benefit the most from a thinner oil is one who does frequent short trips, where the cold viscosity differences between a 10W60 and a 10W30 are very large.

However I wouldn't say a thick oil would make you loose power compared to a thin on the dyno as the differences are down to the margin of error.

Cheers :D

Edited by Busky2k

Ive been using castrol R 10w 60 in my 33 since compliance...its only had 1 oil change so far at 5000kms ( due for the next 1 in about 2-3000km).

on startup, the pressure is at 3/4 of the stock gauge (6). when its warmed up and driving, it sits right on 4, and when stopped at the lights etc, it goes to 2.

None of that means anything to me, just thought i'd put it up for those who know what they're talking about.

justin911 uses the same oil, and his gauge shows those same readings in his 33 as well :D

personally i think 5000kms is too many between changes. but i am a catious mofo when it comes to maintenence as i punish the ring out of my cars i like to look after them as best i can in every other respect.

  • Like 1
Ive been using castrol R 10w 60 in my 33 since compliance...its only had 1 oil change so far at 5000kms ( due for the next 1 in about 2-3000km).

on startup, the pressure is at 3/4 of the stock gauge (6). when its warmed up and driving, it sits right on 4, and when stopped at the lights etc, it goes to 2.

None of that means anything to me, just thought i'd put it up for those who know what they're talking about.

justin911 uses the same oil, and his gauge shows those same readings in his 33 as well :D

My oil pressure is quite a bit higher than that, my oil pump is 'supposed' to be an rb25det pump.

First thing in the morning no matter what oil I use its up over the 8, well the only oil that was around 7.5 was the 10w30 castrol.

The idle is it sits on 2.

  • 4 weeks later...

lots of talk about pressure not much on viscosity...look at the cSt ratings of the 10W60 etc...compared with the 10W30...cold start is miles different...which is when 90% engine wear occurs.

on top of that a wide spread oil will need ot be changed more often due to the VII content to get the spread...never go past the POE stock oils such as redline and Motul 300v for example.

you op. temp visc. ratings will be similar in a 30 or a 40 60 is probably quite thick still...but the cold start is where u have a gain.

my 2 cents.

lots of talk about pressure not much on viscosity...look at the cSt ratings of the 10W60 etc...compared with the 10W30...cold start is miles different...which is when 90% engine wear occurs.

on top of that a wide spread oil will need ot be changed more often due to the VII content to get the spread...never go past the POE stock oils such as redline and Motul 300v for example.

you op. temp visc. ratings will be similar in a 30 or a 40 60 is probably quite thick still...but the cold start is where u have a gain.

my 2 cents.

for those that dont understand technical stuff, were you saying 10w 60 is good or bad?

is there any reason too high oil pressure is bad? mine is up at 85-90psi at idle when stone cold, and drops to 40-50psi at idle when warm, then hits around 80psi on full rpm under load. its a jun oil pump though, and im running the castrol 10w60 edge as well. it this just because of the relief valve spring being stronger in jun pumps?

is this a benefit ive got such good oil pressure or is there a downside to it?

Edited by CruiseLiner

I cant begin to tell you how good the formular R range is. used the 10w-60 on my GTiR and every single change on my GTR. every 3-5000kms. the 10w-60 is designed for high stress engines. wouldnt you agree that a GTR is a stressful piece of equipment.. therefore since i like pushing my GTR to 9000rpm (katimoto chipped ecu) i think ill use the formula R.

I actually put the formular R EDGE in on sunday and immediately i noticed that it became smooth and quieter again like a tammed lion. maybe its my mind talking but i think the edge is improved it does say so on the bottle. I think ill always use the 10w-60 it only costs me $55 a bottle. and i give my GTR more throttle than brakes. I highly recommend it.

Keep in mind a good oil filter is needed too. DONT USE VALVOLINE. im using a RYCO filter which cost $11 at repco (DICKHEADS). ill be using genuine Nissan Filters next time.

hope that helps u sway ur mind. BTW its not too thick IMO

Mark.

I cant begin to tell you how good the formular R range is. used the 10w-60 on my GTiR and every single change on my GTR. every 3-5000kms. the 10w-60 is designed for high stress engines. wouldnt you agree that a GTR is a stressful piece of equipment.. therefore since i like pushing my GTR to 9000rpm (katimoto chipped ecu) i think ill use the formula R.

I actually put the formular R EDGE in on sunday and immediately i noticed that it became smooth and quieter again like a tammed lion. maybe its my mind talking but i think the edge is improved it does say so on the bottle. I think ill always use the 10w-60 it only costs me $55 a bottle. and i give my GTR more throttle than brakes. I highly recommend it.

Keep in mind a good oil filter is needed too. DONT USE VALVOLINE. im using a RYCO filter which cost $11 at repco (DICKHEADS). ill be using genuine Nissan Filters next time.

hope that helps u sway ur mind. BTW its not too thick IMO

Mark.

Nissan oil filter cost me just tad over 9 bucks at dealer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...