Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

did R33 GTR's just suddenly get cheaper?

i remember they used to be up in the 35+k zone, and while looking on jspec and imports 101 for a car for a mate, we saw 3 R33 GTR's for $25-27,000

one white, one black, and one (my favourite) midnight purple..

admittedly they are somewhat stock, but id rather a nice midnight purple GTR, than my GTS-T.

especially seeing as the money im just about to spend on it getting it the colour, and power i want, i wont see back., and the GTR already has that stuff, and same price.

or perhaps the GTR's im looking at are duds?

some feedback would be great, because ive got this money to drop into my gts-t, but if these gtrs are the real deal, for 26k ill snap one up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/
Share on other sites

did an insurance quote for a $28,000 R33 GTR with minimal mods (exhaust, pods, etc)

ITS CHEAPER TO INSURE A R33 GTR, THAN MY MODDED R33 GTS-T!!!

albeit my gts-t is approx 280rwhp, i thought a gtr which is worth a good $10,000 more, and almost similar power would be more?!

looks like its 33 GTR time people!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289712
Share on other sites

i dont expect it to be grade 5, nor do i expect low km's, lods of mods, etc..

but these ones seem to be in decent condition

one im looking at is dead stock, rims, exhaust, suspension, everything.

has done about 100,000km, and has some scratches on the front bar, so it doesnt seem that bad for $27,000.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289844
Share on other sites

looks like its 33 GTR time people!

only problem with this is no one will buy your gtst ! unless you want to drop 10k off it it seems....

also in my searching im starting to agree with IMACUL8

like you can get a 95-96 gtr vspec for 28k

but you can also pay 36k for the same vehical , there is a reason for that .

im starting to think it would be wiser to come in at the top end of the scale and pay 30k top level great condition 32gtr than a average 33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289980
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...