Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

did R33 GTR's just suddenly get cheaper?

i remember they used to be up in the 35+k zone, and while looking on jspec and imports 101 for a car for a mate, we saw 3 R33 GTR's for $25-27,000

one white, one black, and one (my favourite) midnight purple..

admittedly they are somewhat stock, but id rather a nice midnight purple GTR, than my GTS-T.

especially seeing as the money im just about to spend on it getting it the colour, and power i want, i wont see back., and the GTR already has that stuff, and same price.

or perhaps the GTR's im looking at are duds?

some feedback would be great, because ive got this money to drop into my gts-t, but if these gtrs are the real deal, for 26k ill snap one up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/
Share on other sites

did an insurance quote for a $28,000 R33 GTR with minimal mods (exhaust, pods, etc)

ITS CHEAPER TO INSURE A R33 GTR, THAN MY MODDED R33 GTS-T!!!

albeit my gts-t is approx 280rwhp, i thought a gtr which is worth a good $10,000 more, and almost similar power would be more?!

looks like its 33 GTR time people!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289712
Share on other sites

i dont expect it to be grade 5, nor do i expect low km's, lods of mods, etc..

but these ones seem to be in decent condition

one im looking at is dead stock, rims, exhaust, suspension, everything.

has done about 100,000km, and has some scratches on the front bar, so it doesnt seem that bad for $27,000.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289844
Share on other sites

looks like its 33 GTR time people!

only problem with this is no one will buy your gtst ! unless you want to drop 10k off it it seems....

also in my searching im starting to agree with IMACUL8

like you can get a 95-96 gtr vspec for 28k

but you can also pay 36k for the same vehical , there is a reason for that .

im starting to think it would be wiser to come in at the top end of the scale and pay 30k top level great condition 32gtr than a average 33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123867-r33-gtrs/#findComment-2289980
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
×
×
  • Create New...