Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no knock levels are good, but it is generally considered acceptable to tune the pfc to levels up to 30. the less the better tho

do a search for what others have made on dynos with similar mods to yours

thanks bro do you do you no what 195rwkw is in hp at rears???

looks the goods mate.

Did they just do a power run or a full tune?

If it's just a power run then that could explain the knock as jap fuels are higher octane than ours so for a start you should be running the 100RON shell (?) fuel or 98RON fuels. If you're on 98RON already you should get it tuned to that.

looks the goods mate.

Did they just do a power run or a full tune?

If it's just a power run then that could explain the knock as jap fuels are higher octane than ours so for a start you should be running the 100RON shell (?) fuel or 98RON fuels. If you're on 98RON already you should get it tuned to that.

i got tank drained and put 98 bp in it got apexi pfc and avcr fitted 2days ago got dyno today but tommorow new coil pack and re tune i dont no if this will make a difference i was hoping for 250rwkw 195 just doesnt sound rite as 250 is what other people have but its a full tune not just a power ran. cheers for the info man

hey, I wasn't meaning you were still running jap fuel, just that if it was a power run of a jap tune then that tune would have been done to higher octance fuel than we have here. Therefore when it ran on the dyno using 98RON it may have caused the knock.

I'm no expert but make sure you're dealing with people who know how to tune a powerfc too!

hey, I wasn't meaning you were still running jap fuel, just that if it was a power run of a jap tune then that tune would have been done to higher octance fuel than we have here. Therefore when it ran on the dyno using 98RON it may have caused the knock.

I'm no expert but make sure you're dealing with people who know how to tune a powerfc too!

i got new pfc and avcr here so its oz tuned no jap tune or fuel in it. it had a signal chip in it thats why i rippedmit out and goin with a new pfc to oz conditions and fuels

hey man is that all thats done to yours is there anything else i had 880cc injectors, greedy f/rail, power fc, after market front mount, 700hp fuel pump, greedy boostcontroller made 415 to the wheels on 1bar boost standard internals and turbo's is yours the n1 motor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...