Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

Looking at R32's to purchase and i've noticed some have side indicators and some dont.

Both of these are 1993 r32 gtst...

no side indicator

W1019711514705.jpg

side indicator

r32grey7xl.jpg

Looking at R32 catalouge none of them have side indicators...

r32catalouge1dp.jpg

Any reason why?

Thanks

- Patrick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/124027-r32-side-indicator/
Share on other sites

It would be the same as removing your eye level brake light, if the transport department or police really wanted to they could issue a defect for them being removed. However that said if they are being that picky I think this would be the least of your worries.

15 year old import = no need to install side repeater

SEVS/CPA scheme compliance = need to install side repeater depending on engineering data used to get compliance.

the reason for this is when the GTR was sold locally as an amalgamation model, it was deemed that at one point on the side you couldn't see the front or rear indicators, creating a blind spot, so a repeater was installed. So it is required of subsequent skylines complianced under SEVS or CPA that they match the original GTR's (hence why they also snip the wires to the inside tail lights). But then it seems only SOME compliancers used this data, others used engineering data that proved that side repeaters weren't required.

So to be pulled up for having no side indicators require the issuing officer to have a firm grasp on compliance rules and know how to identify a 15year old import from a SEVS car, and also what engineering data was used by the compliancer.

In short, piss em off.

15 year old import = no need to install side repeater

SEVS/CPA scheme compliance = need to install side repeater depending on engineering data used to get compliance.

In short, piss em off.

Haha, thanks for the advice, thats kinda what i was thinking, if someone is going to that level to defect you, there is plenty other things they could go for, most wouldn't notice. And you could play dumb, the car looks so much better without them and unlike the GTR, the gts-t's front and rear 1/4 panels arent as flared, so im pretty sure the indicators would be visible in most/all traffic situations.

i imported a '90 gtr. i checked it at the docks. it had side indicators. this was before compliance. asked the compliance dude - he said all he had to do was side intrusion, child restraints (straight thru the rear speakers, thanls very little) and high mount rear vis light - change fluids, convert mirrors to flat rather than convex, and that was it.

took it over the pits and all they looked for was rivets in doors (to show side intrusion bars) rear high mount brake light and child restraints (how many gtr drivers are gonna stuff their kids into one of these things ???) - check to see no ridiculous intake/turbo/exhaust mods and...

job done.

$3 - $5k thanks for coming.

Edited by atessa

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...