Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just purchased some rims that came with new Falken RT 615 semi comps in soft compound on the rear. I was intending them to be circuit rubber but I was also going to make my way down to Calder soon and was wondering how they would go as a drag tire... specifically what psi should I have in them and how long do I need to smoke them for to get the right amount of heat?

I know they are a relatively new tire so nobody may have specific experience with them but any comments/advice would be appreciated. :huh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/124435-falken-semi-comps-as-a-drag-tire/
Share on other sites

circuit tyres dont work at all well as drag tyres.

The sidewalls are hard, and have no flex.

You'd be better off on the street tyres, using 20-24psi in them which will give more traction that a hard walled semi that wont have much play at all.

RT215 / RT615's are a street tyre not a semi, but have a stiffer sidewall than most road tyres. Their treadwear rating is 180-200.

Semi slick 'R' compound tyres eg Bridgestone RE55s, Toyo RA888, Yoko A032R are 60-80 treadwear.

The Falkens should grip better than most street tyres though.

Edited by VHR32

Whilst I'm no drag racer, I have absolutely no doubt that semis will hook up better than your regular road tyres. My experiences on both (Bridgestones verus Azeni RT215 255/40/17) is that the car is all over the road on the bridgestones, and much more composed on the semis.

Only problem is you don't get an awful lot of KM out of them :)

haha geez thanks for all agreeing guys... something to think about I guess... in answer to VHR32 they are definately an 'R' compound semi race tire but yes they have a treadwear rating of 200 which makes them the most streetable of the semis but also I would imagine slower ona track compared to RE55s etc... but thats why I am using them daily rather than keeping them in the shed (I only drive like 2kms to work and back)...

if anyone is interested they are lovely to drive on the street with, nice and quiet, great in the wet, they also tramline less than other tires I have had... only downside so far is they are worse in choppy side streets as they don't soak up the bumps as well but an okay trade off when you go round a corner and they don't try and roll onto the tires shoulder blah blah... anyway I am very happy, might even take a regular tired set to Calder and do a back to back comparison

There is nothing R compound about a tyre with a treadwear rating of 200! Falken have long been producing tyres that look like R compound tyres but aren't. A proper set of R coumpounds are night and day by comparison to the Falkens.

I have driven on Azenis RT215, Hankook Z2000, Yokohama A032R, Brigestone RE55S, Toyo RA01. The Azenis are not a true R compound tyre. They are only a marginal improvement over a normal street tyre. There is no real improvement in outright grip levels, but they are much more responsive and consistent due to the sidewall construction and larger treadblocks.

but if you want a tyes for the drags, why not get ones designed for that?

yes you are right harry. I think people above are confusing a 'semi slick' with an R-compound (aka S-tyre). the falkens are most certainly a semi-slick. ie they have a semi slick style tread pattern which is completely different to a conventional road tyre. they also have stiff, square sidewalls. however they are not made from an R-compound rubber.

I didn't get them for drags I got them as an everday/circuit tire... mate has been wanting to go to Calder recently and I was wondering if I should leave them on or trash and old set...

as for outright grip levels I would have to agree they are only marginally better than the Michelin Pilot sports (best tire I have had on to compare with) but as you have stated the feel and sidewall make for a much more predictable drive... I should really reserve judgement tho, as I haven't pushed them on a track yet

yes you are right harry. I think people above are confusing a 'semi slick' with an R-compound (aka S-tyre). the falkens are most certainly a semi-slick. ie they have a semi slick style tread pattern which is completely different to a conventional road tyre. they also have stiff, square sidewalls. however they are not made from an R-compound rubber.

ah okay, I will cease to refer to them as R compound :nyaanyaa:

personally, I wouldn't even call them semi slicks. People use the terms semi slick, R compound, etc interchangably when referring to soft compound competition tyres. Semi slick is about more than the tread pattern to most people - its about a tyre halfway between a street tyre and a slick, and that's more than just a flash race looking tread pattern - its about how they perform.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
×
×
  • Create New...