Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

just wondering if people can post up their settings of an RB20 with cam gears

or have any suggestions

My mods:

rb20det

- R33 turbo

- 3 inch full exhaust (split dump)

- FMIC (600x300x75) no name

- Hks pod

- Bosch 040

- EBC

- Cam Gears (in/ex)

stock injectors/afm etc

please dont tell me to take it to a shop to get it tune

Cheers

Thanks for your time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/125008-rb20-cam-gear-settings/
Share on other sites

if your gonna give it ago, dont adjust them more than 3degrees at a time. Remember to check how many increments you are actually adjusting. Most of the time they will have on there e.g. one increment is 2degrees or something. Once you adjust the exhaust cam gear, you will have to redo your base ignition timing.

Most people advance inlet and retard ex. from memory..... my car was diff. tho.

why can't we say take it to a shop to get it tuned?

each car is different, and yours might make less power than the next car with the same settings

but saying that, your setup is very similar to mine. see the link below. my gears are set at

in: +3

ex: -5

link: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...=115398&hl=

I agree totally, these adjustments should be done on a dyno see you can see the result of your adjustment.

your car is different to the next and will require different settings.

why can't we say take it to a shop to get it tuned?

each car is different, and yours might make less power than the next car with the same settings

but saying that, your setup is very similar to mine. see the link below. my gears are set at

in: +3

ex: -5

link: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...=115398&hl=

  • 2 years later...

if your friend has a dyno should be able to find your own settings,

these aren't magic numbers, people play with them on the dyno and see what works

you should do the same

you dont dial in the cams and have a run, then think, ok that diddnt work, ill try another completely different one.

You start at ur current timing, adjust a degree or two, then have a run, then adjust and run etc. Ull find the point where it makes the best power.

only reason why you would want some timing settings that have worked on other cars would be if you didnt have access to a dyno

hope the tuning goes well,

post up a dyno result when ur done, before and after would be nice

Basically, you ought to have proper facilities to do the measurements needed to justify any adjustments hence people telling you to take it to a shop.

No one who has any experience is going to say different, there isn't the kind of consensus about RB20 cam timing settings as per the RB26 with stock turbos and cams. Timing adjustments are dependent on a range of factors.

You ideally need to retune the fuel and timing to optimise adjustments.

I notice you have no aftermarket ecu?

If this is the case then you need to be careful with adjustments and basically a wideband sensor is very good idea.

So you understand 'why' you are moving the cam timing. You should do a little research but, failing that here is my intitial 2c to get you started.

* Advancing the intake cam moves the valve closer to the piston (be careful- not too far) and as a result you get increased cranking compression. You aim to end up with better bottom end power. The peak magnitude of power changes is centred around really the peak of the hill (one spot) but, kind of moves the whole hill under it. You advance and generally the power peak moves down the rpm range, to a point. I think you find due to the relation to cranking compression , things like turbos airflow/boost/ engine breathing characteristics make it slightly more tricky and effect which way you go from 0 -or+ and how far.

* Retarding the exhaust cam moves the valve closer to the piston (be careful not too far) it tends to effect power more generally over the entire curve. But to less magnitude than the intake changes do. The exhaust cam setting is more of a engine specific/characteritics thing. Sometimes advanced sometimes retard.

* Tune at an initial boost a little lower than you want to end up at. Tune for increased boost later.

* Dial in and advance/ retard intake cam first , then the exhaust cam.

Edited by rev210

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...