Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am trying to make a comprehensive list of import cars and the years in which the different models were produced. So if you could please peruse over the information I have collected and advise me of any mistakes/inaccuracies that would be great. The purpose of making this list is so that I can classify performance parts under one of the corresponding descriptions.

The format is:

Common name (Chassis Code) Year Start/Month Start - Year End/Month End

180SX (PS13/KRS13) 89/4 - 91/1

180SX (RPS13/KRPS13) 91/1 - 93/12

180SX (RPS13/KRPS13) 94/1 - 96/7

180SX (RPS13/KRPS13) 96/8 - 99/1

180SX (All Series) 89/4 - 99/1

Silvia (PS13/KPS13) 91/1 - 93/10

200SX (S14/CS14) 93/10 - 99/1

200SX (S15) 99/1 - 02/8

R32 GTS (HR32) 89/5 - 94/11

R32 GTS-t (HCR32/HNR32) 89/5 - 93/8

R32 GTR (BNR32) 89/8 - 95/1

R33 GTS (HR33) 93/8 - 97/11

R33 GTS-25t (ECR33) 93/8 - 98/5

R33 GTR (BCNR33) 95/1 - 99/1

R34 GTS (ENR34) 98/5 - ?/?

R34 GTT (ER34) 98/5 - 01/6

R34 GTR (BNR34) 99/1 - 02/8

300ZX (Z31) 84/1 - 89/12

300ZX (Z32) 89/7 - 00/8

350Z (Z33) 02/08 - ?/?

Gti-R (RNN14) 92/1 - 95/12

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/126323-nissan-import-production-years/
Share on other sites

I'm just going on what I found from catalogues and the internet, if you could provide a month and year that would be awesome. I will look into all responses though.

thanks again

R32 GTS (HR32) 89/5 - 94/11

The r32 gts/gtst was only built up to and including 1993, the only r32 built in 1994 was the gtr... at least thats what i thought, probably wrong. Also i've never heard of a 1995 r32 gtr, is there such a thing?? surely any would be worth a bit if nissan stopped production in January 1995 (assuming the above information is correct)

Edited by r32line

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...