Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The Poll thread was removed as it was suppose to be a serious and u guys stuffed that up.

URMINE, SDU4EVA, HUSTLR let ppl have there say, in a serious unbiased way.

From the SDU forum it seems most ppl want to keep SDU as the name or they want join. We need the numbers to make this successful. Two or three people making decissions and then saying this is how its gonna work is why the NZ club went down hill.

I will put the poll up again if you will behave, this goes to everyone.

Think me a nazi if you want but trying to organise this thing takes time, and when ppl constantly muck around, it makes u wonder if its worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/
Share on other sites

skyzerr33... why dont u just delete the stupid reply's? instead of deleting the thread.. yes i agree we get out of hand sometimes.. i dont remmeber how far this one went.. cause i been in a meeting for the past hour..

im sure none of the offending party's really mind if posts are deleted.. ive even deleted a couple myself from other threads.. im not sure if u can put them back .. but we need to have this thread going again

and as far as the sdu thread/ posts go.. a couple of ppl have said they cant be bothered changing the stickers.. and its thats ppl's reason for wanting to stick with the sdu name i dont really think its good enough.. another mentioned buying power or something.. ?? sdu will not help us here either as they aint aus based and no one knows who they are..

im still yet to hear a good reason to stay with sdu name..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/#findComment-3039
Share on other sites

plainly it was easier to delete the whole thread, u guys got it down to about 23-24 posts 20 of which where the funnier sort.

as for the name your point is valid. tell the other aussies there and see what they say. i'm trying poorly to keep it democratic. i think its cause they know the forum the name and they idenify with it, so thats why they don't want to change. for those ppl we can still be our own club, whatever the name and have an affiliation with sdu.

just out of curiosity if we put the names SAU, NAS and SDU on a poll on both sites and SDU won when combined would u live with it or not join? As stated b4 for it to work its gota be a majority thing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/#findComment-3048
Share on other sites

skyzerr.. dont worry mate its all democratic.. we wont hold it against u...

as for the name i dont really care.. id prefer not to be associated with sdu.. but a name is just that.. its the ppl i want to be associated wiht.. and as long as all u guys are here i dont realy give a hoot with what were called!.. and most of here i think feel the same...

the dwindling few on sdu.. are the ones who arnt on very often id say.. they most prob dont like change.. but we will grow very quickly here .. ull see.. and id say theyll all join..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/#findComment-3049
Share on other sites

Troy I really think Name is not therelevant issue really.

To me Name isnt important but having a club with all you guys in it matters to me. And I am willing to put in money to start a club.

Guys lets for once and all settle a name so we can move onto the next stage.

YOur choice will be your final choice. No going back!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/#findComment-3050
Share on other sites

well i think i will start a new name poll tomorrow with the three names on both sites let it run a week and go with the winner? all agreed with this.

in the mean time we can sort the charter/constitution out as that has to be handed in as part of registration of the incorperation/association.

i have two 3 at home will post later tonight, if anyone else has one they think may work please post a copy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127-poll-thread/#findComment-3053
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...