Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the way the guy who had the suzuki explained it to me, they let the supercharger go from 0 revs and the turbo as well... the turbo spooled twice as fast because the supercharger created more exhaust pressure. Once the pressure built up and the turbo charger was about to start working in its optimal range the supercharger would cut off to prevent over induction. When the pressure from the turbocharger drops down to a certain level the supercharger starts again.

Its funkyshite but it worked hella mad... it managed to chop my 1.8L with the T67

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

refering to engine mods such as conversions, Turboing or superchaging or what ever. Also i have heard mix rumors about turboing a GTS Sklyine 2.5L is it good or bad and if you did turbo it could you then keep up with the GTST and will it mess your engine up.

Guest neoGT-25

well with 5 grand... i would make it a beast of a nat-asp :P (Insurence stops me from turbo)

i would make it powerfull enough to give some GTS-t's a good run for there money! :P

meh but seriously... im defently going to buy a kakimoto hyper 2000 premium N1 single exhaust sytem :D $1005 from purfectrun.com.au (I think its the one Demon Dave has on his R34)

KAKIMOTO EXHAUST PIC

Pipe diameter - 70mm

Tail pipe diameter - 115mm

and best of all... they make them for the R34 25GT :D LOL

meh... byes all :burnout:

im not a fan of the angled exhaust, thats why for my turbo engine i opted for a hks super dragger

now u might think "yeah its pretty big" but if you've only seen it in pictures before, once u see it in real life MY GOD! ITS HUGE! THE BARREL IS MASSIVE! TIP IS 5"! I CAN BLOODY LIVE IN THERE!

remember as always i still have some n/a parts for sale if u want them :P

oh...yeah :P

ummmm

probebly wouldnt be a good upgrade for ur car as they are 33 parts not 34 (u barsted i hate you grrr) but i have gearbox, breaks and rotors (maybe dunno yet might be sold :() lsd diff...stuff...err...i wonder if i should sell the old exhaust? anyway, exhaust is 2.5" mandrel whatever

er...i really should advertise all these in for sale section...but then again im not saying any prices..yet..but yeah :D

Hi

We just this last weekend swapped the converted engine out for a 25det.

Big thanks to DamqikGTST and Bigfella for the huge effort

We swapped the gearbox also (they are very different)

$3k i payed for the lot. noone really knows how strong the NA boxes are for sure. some say they are the same as the 20det box which dont have any problems with decent power.

your wiring loom can stay as its identical. you will need a 25det ecu though.

this is a much cheaper option than trying to turbo your existing motor. it was only viable for me coz i sourced the parts cheap and already had a controllable ecu.

my car now running standard ecu/boost is pulling smoother/harder than my conversion did.

things we HAD to change:

front half of tailshaft (the end that goes into the det gearbox is much heftier than the na one)

the speed sensor between the two gearboxes are different. (still havent fixed this yet

the clutch slave cylinder is different (need the det one or make up a custom bracket like old Bob did for us :P )

All of these above problems would be avoided if you retained the NA gearbox

plus...

you have to keep the original NA engine mounts (discovered this the hard way)

we swapped the fuel pump also as they are different and not worth taking a chance on.

ask any questions now if you want while its still fresh in the head. :D

i would recommend this over a conversion now given the end results and relatively cheap too. dont worry about the brakes they are fine unless you plan on takin it to the track often.

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...