Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.autoblog.com/2005/11/27/next-91...rbine-geometry/

http://digg.com/tech_news/Porsche_s_new_tu...ogy_for_the_911

Next 911 Turbo to feature Variable Turbine Geometry

November 16 of this year marked the day a century ago that Dr. Alfred Buchi received the first patent for an exhaust gas turbocharger. Porsche will be celebrating the turbo's 100-year anniversary a little late when it introduces the next 911 Turbo sometime next year with Variable Turbine Geometry. This technology allows the angle of the compressor's turbine blades to continually adjust. While some diesel engines have enjoyed this technology since the Nineties, the higher exhaust gas temperatures created by gasoline engines necessitated the creation of new heat-resistant materials to handle the hotness. Porsche and Borg Warner Turbo Systems were able to overcome the heat issue and have developed a VTG turbo system that will be incorporated into the next 911 Turbo. The VTG turbo will allow Porsche's flat-six to mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own. Power ratings for the new VTG turbo engine haven't been released and probably won't be until the new 911 Turbo surfaces sometime next year.

2051115.002.mini1L.jpg

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127801-variable-turbine-geometry/
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Your wish is my command.

http://www.porsche.com/all/masterwerk/flas...&height=513

Click Masterwerk once the Flash demo has finished loading.

Then under Act One click Variable Turbine Geometry.

I thought the new 997 Turbo was running twin VTG's. Its only a single?

While I realise that using a VTG system can mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own....it begs the question, why not just run twin turbos? Occams Razor, etc......

On any V engine (and a boxer engine especially), you hit plumbing problems with a single turbo. What's the benefit of going back to a single turbine rather than running a pair of turbines?

Imagine this engine with a pair of VTG turbos?

It's not the turbine blades that move on VNT turbos, it's the blades around the edge of the turbine that direct the exhaust gas on to it. It'd be impossible to do it the other way around.

Correct. In commercial aircraft engines they are called Nozzle Guide Vanes ( NGV's ) in the turbine or Variable Inlet Guide Vanes ( VIGV's ) in the Compressor. They change the angle of attack of the air going into the blades ( vanes in the case of turbo's ). Keeping in mind that in aircraft engines, the geometry of the turbine is not variable because of reliability and cost.

I'll be very interested to see how this goes into the future !!

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

I'd be extremely impressed if they can hold to that !!! ( and maintain full operating efficiency ).

These Garret VNT turbos have been around for about twenty years, nothing really new here.

They are not really suitable for petrol engines which is why Garret are pushing their GT ball bearing turbos for performance petrol engines, and the VNT turbos only for diesel engines. If these things worked as well as people think they do, companies like HKS would be offering them.

I ran a Garret VNT turbo on my Ford Laser for around two years so I can speak from plenty of practical experience.

You can order one from any Nissan dealer, part number is 14411-VC100 (charger assy-turbo). Back in 2003 it cost me $1454.55.

These variable vane turbos are the standard turbo fitted to the 4.0 litre Nissan Patrol diesel engine in Australia, and that particular engine produces 150Kw, so they are a rather small turbo. Two of these would be required on a larger engine.

Porsche seem to have made it work, where nobody else has. No doubt it took a lot of fairly sophisticated engine management and a lot of development. Don't think you can just bolt one on to your Skyline and get the same sort of results without the control system to make it work properly. There is far more to it han just hooking up a standard wastegate actuator to the vane control arm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...