Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.autoblog.com/2005/11/27/next-91...rbine-geometry/

http://digg.com/tech_news/Porsche_s_new_tu...ogy_for_the_911

Next 911 Turbo to feature Variable Turbine Geometry

November 16 of this year marked the day a century ago that Dr. Alfred Buchi received the first patent for an exhaust gas turbocharger. Porsche will be celebrating the turbo's 100-year anniversary a little late when it introduces the next 911 Turbo sometime next year with Variable Turbine Geometry. This technology allows the angle of the compressor's turbine blades to continually adjust. While some diesel engines have enjoyed this technology since the Nineties, the higher exhaust gas temperatures created by gasoline engines necessitated the creation of new heat-resistant materials to handle the hotness. Porsche and Borg Warner Turbo Systems were able to overcome the heat issue and have developed a VTG turbo system that will be incorporated into the next 911 Turbo. The VTG turbo will allow Porsche's flat-six to mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own. Power ratings for the new VTG turbo engine haven't been released and probably won't be until the new 911 Turbo surfaces sometime next year.

2051115.002.mini1L.jpg

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127801-variable-turbine-geometry/
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a working diagram of one of these turbos in more detail.

Your wish is my command.

http://www.porsche.com/all/masterwerk/flas...&height=513

Click Masterwerk once the Flash demo has finished loading.

Then under Act One click Variable Turbine Geometry.

I thought the new 997 Turbo was running twin VTG's. Its only a single?

While I realise that using a VTG system can mimic a twin-turbo setup with a much broader torque curve and more flexible powerband than a standard single turbo could provide on its own....it begs the question, why not just run twin turbos? Occams Razor, etc......

On any V engine (and a boxer engine especially), you hit plumbing problems with a single turbo. What's the benefit of going back to a single turbine rather than running a pair of turbines?

Imagine this engine with a pair of VTG turbos?

It's not the turbine blades that move on VNT turbos, it's the blades around the edge of the turbine that direct the exhaust gas on to it. It'd be impossible to do it the other way around.

Correct. In commercial aircraft engines they are called Nozzle Guide Vanes ( NGV's ) in the turbine or Variable Inlet Guide Vanes ( VIGV's ) in the Compressor. They change the angle of attack of the air going into the blades ( vanes in the case of turbo's ). Keeping in mind that in aircraft engines, the geometry of the turbine is not variable because of reliability and cost.

I'll be very interested to see how this goes into the future !!

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

The engine is going to need to run VERY cleanly to stop the guide vanes from siezing up with carbon build-up and I would imagine that the turbo service life on the new 911 would probably be an overhaul at something like 60,000km intervals.

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

Latest article I read, Porsche quotes 161,000km (100,00miles) for replacement or complete overhaul of the turbos :

I'd be extremely impressed if they can hold to that !!! ( and maintain full operating efficiency ).

These Garret VNT turbos have been around for about twenty years, nothing really new here.

They are not really suitable for petrol engines which is why Garret are pushing their GT ball bearing turbos for performance petrol engines, and the VNT turbos only for diesel engines. If these things worked as well as people think they do, companies like HKS would be offering them.

I ran a Garret VNT turbo on my Ford Laser for around two years so I can speak from plenty of practical experience.

You can order one from any Nissan dealer, part number is 14411-VC100 (charger assy-turbo). Back in 2003 it cost me $1454.55.

These variable vane turbos are the standard turbo fitted to the 4.0 litre Nissan Patrol diesel engine in Australia, and that particular engine produces 150Kw, so they are a rather small turbo. Two of these would be required on a larger engine.

Porsche seem to have made it work, where nobody else has. No doubt it took a lot of fairly sophisticated engine management and a lot of development. Don't think you can just bolt one on to your Skyline and get the same sort of results without the control system to make it work properly. There is far more to it han just hooking up a standard wastegate actuator to the vane control arm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSP male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSP reducing bush?
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...