Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I have been meaning to do this since i signed up!

6U9000ERC33029557

Thanks in advance!

Dan

Pretty sure you put the 'R' and the 'C' around the wrong way mate. If you meant to put ECR33 029557 this is your fast mate.

post-16070-1220953407_thumb.jpg

Can some one do this for me?

It is supposed to be a vspec

6U9000BNR32300152

sorry mate not a vspec.

post-16070-1221208769_thumb.jpg

Use this link to decode it so you can see its not a vspec

http://www.users.on.net/~goofyhsk/info/chassis_plate.html

Hi again

Still working through the conversion stuff

Could you please find part numbers for

V35 5 speed auto 3.5 VIN is PV35500185 engine loom

Z33 5 speed auto 3.5 VIN JN1GAAZ33A0010030 (gave you it all, just in case) engine loom, ecu and gearbox

Z33 5 speed auto 3.5 VIN JN12AAZ33A0250072 (gave you it all, just in case) engine loom, ecu and gearbox

Regards

Edited by CeffyNSW
OK guys

Too much to ask by the sounds, my apologies.

Working through some wiring diagrams and it should be OK.

Regards

Would appreciate someone doing my v35 2004 sedan.

VIN 6U90000PV35450969. Need to know if it has viscous lsd or not?

Thanks in anticipation. Graeme

You guys should PM "chook". I cant fast v35's.

sorry guys

Can anyone tell me if KBNR32RXFS AA is a normal GTR or V-Spec?

Bought it 5 years ago as a normal GTR, but the chassis plate decoding page seems to indicate it would be a V-Spec. Not fussed either way, it has Brembo's on the front, standard Nissan callipers on the rear and a few other V-Spec pieces in it. It will always be my B-Spec (bitsa everything).

BNR32219986

Cheers :)

If you use the last 6 digits of your vin on the website i use to decode the r32 model codes it says your gtr was built between 07/1992 and 08/1992 so its not a vspec but when i type in your vin nothing comes up. I have to also put in your model code. which confirms it isnt a vspec. Strange because i havent had to do that before. :)

Here is your fast mate

post-16070-1221731959_thumb.jpg

Edited by babyskyline
If you use the last 6 digits of your vin on the website i use to decode the r32 model codes it says your gtr was built between 07/1992 and 08/1992 so its not a vspec but when i type in your vin nothing comes up. I have to also put in your model code. which confirms it isnt a vspec. Strange because i havent had to do that before. :)

Here is your fast mate

post-16070-1221731959_thumb.jpg

Cool, thanks for that. I seem to recall that happening a few years ago when it was FAST'ed.

Wonder why it lacks the 7 on the end of the model code which would indicate its a normal GTR, as according to that code site a lacking number means its a V-Spec... *shrug*. It has all the V-Spec running gear and a few other 'mechanical oddities' every reputable GTR workshop I have taken it to has never seen before, so ill keep calling it my B-Spec :)

Edited by Amaru

Im really hoping im wrong but because it has the brembo's, and all the v-spec running gear as you said, and seems to have a vspec model code but has the vin of a car that was made in 1992....it might be dodgey. Im really hoping its not for your sake but it sort of sounds like someone added vspec gear and tried to pass it off as a vspec with the model code.

it sort of sounds like someone added vspec gear and tried to pass it off as a vspec with the model code.

Well it wasnt sold to me as a V-Spec, but as a normal GTR with Brembo's so im not fussed about that (e.g. I didnt buy it because it was advertised as a V-Spec). Have attached a pic of the VIN plate, it looks real and doesnt look like it has been changed.

post-2672-1221733587_thumb.jpg

I wouldnt be worried about it if you didnt pay the extra for bein a "vspec". As long as your happy it should be fine. Just seems strange to have had the gear put on and a vspec model code but not be a vspec.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...